.
Feedback

The 'Gay Agenda'

What is the 'Gay Agenda' and what are we pushing....

 

Last week, I posted my first blog on the Patch regarding the Boy Scouts of America's unjust policy of discriminating against LGBT (Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender) parents and scouts. While scanning the comments, one contributor wrote [sic], “The Gay Agenda is not in the Majority on this issue. Most of America is against this huge media push to push everything Gay onto America.”

The writer citied a MSN poll as empirical evidence. ( I did politely point out to the reader that polls such as that are not scientific and can not be generalized to the population and pointed to a Gallup poll that shows different findings http://www.gallup.com/poll/154634/Acceptance-Gay-Lesbian-Relations-New-Normal.aspx ).

Nonetheless, I did find the idea of the “Gay Agenda” interesting. I started to ask myself what is the “Gay Agenda?” And what is it that we are “pushing”...? 

Yes, as social justice activists, we have an agenda. This agenda is based on the notion that all Americans deserve equality. This is an agenda that says LGBT youth should be able to go to school without fear of being harassed, beat-up, or killed.

Our agenda is that brave men and women can and should be able to serve in our United States Military openly and honestly. Our agenda is that loving and committed couples should be recognized by the state and federal government through marriage. Our agenda is that LGBT  people should not be fired from our jobs because of who we are.  

And most importantly, the Gay Agenda is the Women’s Agenda, the Black Agenda, the Working Class Agenda, the American Agenda, the Human Agenda. The Gay Agenda is part of an intersectional movement towards eliminating unfair obstacles, providing opportunities for the marginalized, and imagining a world where each person can live and grow to our capacity. 

While writing this post, I found myself drawn to the words of Dr. Cornel West: “To accept your country without betraying it, you must love it for that which shows what it might become. America -- this monument to the genius of ordinary men and women, this place where hope becomes capacity, this long, halting turn of 'no' into the 'yes' -- needs citizens who love it enough to re-imagine and re-make it.” 

My challenge to all of us is to look deep within ourselves and 're-imagine' our world: Ask yourself: what kind of world do I want to leave for the next generation?

My answer is “simple”: I want to leave a world where women are respected and not abused, raped and murdered by men, where people of color are not fueling the prison industrial complex and have equal access to all of our institutions, where working class families don't have to worry about feeding our families, where LGBT people aren’t being killed because of who we love, where immigrants are provided a safe route to citizenship, and where all people are respected and valued. In short, I envision the Gay Agenda. 

Mike July 28, 2012 at 02:03 pm
You selected an interesting quote from Dr. West where he and you indicate we must be "accepting" in order for our country (and by inference each of us individually) to be great. I assume in context of your blog, you mean we must "accept" the agenda you laid out. Certainly much of what you wrote is worthy of acceptance, but i am troubled and dont necessarily agree that one must "accept" a gay lifstyle in order for a country or an individual to be great. By not accepting, does that mean we are not great or good or worthy? I think there is a great difference between "tolerance" and "acceptance". I think we are all called and should be tolerant, but that does not mean acceptance. We can all tolerate a great deal, but that does not mean we have to accept it. I think the greater concern here is what i would call the tyranny of acceptance. We see big ciity mayors and other act with great tyranny and threat against a private buisness because it does not accept gay marriage. This buisness tolerates it since it would be descrimination not to, but it does not accept it. A BIG difference. Somewhere along the line acceptance and tolerance has come to mean the same thing and they are not.
Watchdog July 28, 2012 at 02:08 pm
He did not impose anything on anyone
Laurel Salmon July 28, 2012 at 02:19 pm
@Watchdog what law is threatening "traditional" marriage? Why does it need people to come out and support it? What is the name of the amendment to overturn the right of heterosexual people to marry that is being funded by corporations and religious organizations?
Watchdog July 28, 2012 at 05:16 pm
I believe he has the right to say what he wants to say, when and where he wants to say it without being attacked, vilified and protested by the intolerant gay people who do not agree with him . AND he does not have to explain why either, any more than Bill Gates has to explain to meehy he contributed millions on support of a gay agenda item. Difference is that I will continue to buy Microsoft products while gays boycott., going for the jugular.
Felicia July 28, 2012 at 07:16 pm
@ Laurel Salmon - The CEO from Chick Fil A was speaking to a Christian Newspaper, The Biblical Recorder, not making a public statement. You are right, gays do not need CEO's or corporations to support them... so why all the fuss. And you are wrong, Chic Fil A has not treated gays any differently then any other customer.
The definition of Tolerance - "a fair, objective, and permissive attitude toward opinions and practices that differ from one's own." Being Tolerant does not mean you change your personal beliefs and take on someone else's. It means that you treat people fairly even though their beliefs are different than your own... which is what Jospeh Coe is asking for in his article, I believe. In the Chic Fil A story, Which side is being more tolerant? Is there any evidence that Chic Fil A has ever treated a gay person differently than any other customer? I have not heard any. Now look at the protesters, trying to shut down Chic Fil A because they don't agree with the business owners personal beliefs about marriage. Look at the definition, Is that being tolerant? Tolerance is a two way street.
Laurel Salmon July 28, 2012 at 08:42 pm
@Watchdog You misunderstand me. Like every other person in this country, he has a right to say whatever he wants. We all do, that is what makes this country great! His right to express himself is a right that is protected by the laws of this great country that we live in. The consequence of making statements like the one that he made is that people will be believe (rightly so in my opinion) that he is anti-gay marriage and that profits from the company he owns will be used to fund amendments that purposely limit the rights of other citizens of this country. A further consequence of that @Mike is that the mayor of Chicago (a big city) is not interested in doing business with him. Another consequence of that is that the people who disagree with him funding amendments that limit their right to marry other consenting adults who they want to marry, are protesting his business. He isn't being vilified, he is being taken at his word. That is what happens to adults, we all have the right to say what we want to say, but we must all face the consequences of those statements.
Laurel Salmon July 28, 2012 at 09:09 pm
@Mike I am curious what you think "accepting a gay lifestyle" entails? Why should a business profit off of people that the business owner feels aren't worthy of the same rights that he has? Why should they be vilified for exercising their right to protest?
Laurel Salmon July 28, 2012 at 09:45 pm
@Felicia You misunderstood what I wrote. A statement made to a newspaper is still public, even if it is a Christian newspaper and Dan Cathy has a history of making comments that illustrate his bias against LGBTQ community. It is his personal belief and he has a right to share it, no one is saying that he doesn't have the right to share it. However, people also have a right to boycott/protest his business if they disagree. Why should people give money to a man who uses his profits to fund legislation to oppress them?
Felicia July 28, 2012 at 09:47 pm
Laurel, would you be ok with people not going to a restaurant because the owner has admitted in public to being gay and in favor of same sex marriage? What about a large number of heterosexuals holding a kiss in the parking lot, preventing customers from entering. It would just be a consequence of his stating his belief. Maybe there are some heterosexuals that don't want a gay business owner to use his profits to support same sex marriage. Tolerance is a two way street.
Watchdog July 28, 2012 at 11:00 pm
OK so all marriage traditionalists should boycott Microsoft and Aaxon because their evaders gave millions to the gay agenda? THAT is the difference between the intoerant gay movement and the more level headed tolerant folks who realize everyone gas a right to their own opinion. The same Chicago mayor welcomes a hater like Farrakhan so I would not put too much stock in his judgment.
Watchdog July 28, 2012 at 11:02 pm
That is AMAZON, not Aaxon in my last post.
Watchdog July 28, 2012 at 11:05 pm
It is called tolerance in most circles.
Kristen Stavisky July 28, 2012 at 11:30 pm
We have one, human agenda. When we all understand this and strive to accept and tolerate that which is "different" this world will be a beautiful place. Until then, we have to keep fighting the good fight and educating those who take a narrow view.
Watchdog July 29, 2012 at 01:52 am
You must learn tolerance for the views of others as they tolerate your views. Protests by gay Democratic activists and their supporters only serves to divide as Obama has dividedthis nation. You do not see traditionalists boycotting and protesting Amazon because Jeff Bezos gave his millions to the gay agenda and gay rights supporters could should learn from that. TOLERANCE needs to be practiced and not merely verbalized. Ones views are not narrow or wide, they are merely ones views to be tolerated by all humans.
Mike July 29, 2012 at 02:18 am
Laurel, my point is crystal clear. Acceptance and tolerance are not the same. The tyranny of acceptance exhibited by the mayors of Boston and Chicago is really quite frightening. If you disagree with Chic - Fil - A's CEOs private held belief then fine dont buy there, but isnt that exactly intolerance? imean forthe mayors of two of two of our llargest cities to threaten a private business from the opportunity to operate is really quite outrageous.
Mike July 29, 2012 at 02:19 am
Disagree. We should tolerate, but do not need to accept something or belief we do not adhere to.
Mike July 29, 2012 at 02:22 am
So now are you saying government should control how someone decides to spend his money or what causes he will fund. Wow! Very Orwellian. Scary.
Mike July 29, 2012 at 12:39 pm
http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2012/07/28/13010224-pawlenty-calls-officials-thumbs-down-on-chick-fil-a-chilling-jaw-dropping?lite&__utma=14933801.840727034.1342955241.1343524590.1343555891.27&__utmb=14933801.3.10.1343555891&__utmc=14933801&__utmx=-&
Pam Sitomer August 1, 2012 at 11:17 pm
What kind of world do I want to leave for the next generation? The kind of world where open-minded people like Joseph Coe exist and a world in which he has the same rights that I have as an American. I don't just say these words; I live them. I have already begun making this kind of world a reality by raising my children to not merely be tolerant of others, but to not accept the intolerance and ignorance of those who would relegate their fellow citizens to second-class status, due to the color of their skin, their religion, or their sexual orientation. Some of my proudest moments as a parent have been when my children have not stood quietly while others were discriminated, particularly in support of the gay community. I did not teach them this because I had a "Gay Agenda," but because I had a human agenda; although, as Joe points out in this article, they are one and the same.
Pam Sitomer August 1, 2012 at 11:28 pm
It is not an equitable comparison to compare not buying and/or protesting Chick-Fil-A, because they publicly do not support gay rights vs. Starbucks, Microsoft, or JC Penny, which do support gay rights and were also boycotted by rightwing groups. Each company is entitled to their beliefs and patrons are entitled to patronize or not, based on those beliefs. The pivotal difference is that if a company donates money to a marriage equality group, they are not altering anybody’s life that disagrees with them. Whereas, Chick-Fil-A put their money in the coffers of campaigns that do everything in their power to deny the rights of their fellow citizens. They are entitled to do that, but the majority of us are equally entitled to protest beyond just tolerating their intolerance. They aren't just selling chicken; they are selling the right to deny our friends and loved ones to be equal Americans. This means gay Americans are subject to taxation without representation. Ironically, we once had a Tea Party to stop that, not perpetuate it.
Watchdog August 2, 2012 at 03:31 am
This man gave funds to organizations that supports Traditional marriage. Gates and Bezos gave money to organizations that support Gay marriage. Same thing.,Many people, myself included, believe that marriage should be between a man and a woman and find it offensive that anyone would try to change that. BTW marriage is not a "right", not in any State, , the Supreme Court may decide That some day but it has not yet done so. . So this man by his donations is not denying anyone "their rights"
Issy August 2, 2012 at 12:27 pm
Not too long ago people said the same thing about mixed marriages.
Watchdog August 2, 2012 at 12:59 pm
As a former Deputy Town Clerk in Clarkstown you should know that marriage is not a "right" in this country, so your analogy and reference to the Tea Party is completely inaccurate. BTW this has ZERO to do with the color of ones skin or their religion. The company employs tens of thousands of people of all colors and religions, so your boycotting will hurt those folks, not help them.
Watchdog August 2, 2012 at 01:05 pm
They still do In some religions. I worked with someone whose Jewish parents were devastated when he married a Christian. However, that is their honest belief which should be tolerated. It certainly does not mean that they hate Christians, if you knew them you would certainly know that.
Laurel Salmon August 2, 2012 at 01:53 pm
It isn't really about individual beliefs. We all have our own opinions, misguided or not. The issue is whether or not we have a right to impose those beliefs on someone else. No straight person is in danger of being forced into a gay marriage so why be "offended" by it?
Walt August 2, 2012 at 02:37 pm
The turnout at the Paramus Chick-fil-a yesterday was amazing. I waited close to an hour on line and the line was just as long when I ordered my food as it was when I got on it. It was wonderful to see so many people support Dan Cathy's freedom of speech and are against the left's, the media and certain politician's attack on it. Watch how fast the Democrats swim away from this whirlpool that they created.
Watchdog August 2, 2012 at 04:04 pm
I AM offended because it destroys the institution of marriage which has been defined as between a man and a woman for hundreds if not thousands of years.
Mike August 2, 2012 at 05:22 pm
Man talk about double speak! So you teach your kids to be tolerant but not to be tolerant when there is an opposing perspective. This is what you wrote and really we need to thank you b/c I think it accurately reflects the attitude of most people on the left. No one argues that discrimination in any kind is wrong both morally and civilly. But that is not what we are discussing here. We to a certain extent must accept laws (although I would argue immoral laws can be opposed), but you can't force anyone to ACCEPT that a practice or lifestyle is ok. As I indicated before, tolerance IS NOT the same thing as acceptance.
Mike August 2, 2012 at 06:12 pm
I think most people came out b/c just as with the hhs mandate which is forcing people to violate their religious liberties, people are just angry that a citizen who happens to run a succesful business cannot apperently practice his freedom of speech without being threatened financially by goon squads consisting of Democrat mayors from large American cities. Its ok when a Hollowywood star or some idiot rock start attacks conservative and religious people, but heaven forbid someone voices their OPINION which is in opposition to these folks.
Lady Madonna August 3, 2012 at 01:34 pm
Please, Walt. The great majority of people on line at the restaurants are those who are anti-gay marriage. Period. Had Dan Cathy said that he hates black people, or even better, that women don't belong in the workforce and should be home cooking dinner and vacuuming, would people still be lining up to support his freedom of speech?
And Watchdog, gay marriage offends you? The institution of marriage is already destroyed. Look at the divorce rate. Look at how many people are out there cheating on their spouses. Marriage is a formal confirmation of two people's love for one another. Why should this offend you, regardless of who those two people are? I surely hope that you don't ever have a child or grandchild who is gay and wants to get married to the same sex. Let me guess...you wouldnt LET your child be gay, right?

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from New City Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Jimmy R June 14, 2013 at 05:10 pm
The first thing little Frankie wanted to know was that since he was mayor of Suffern for the day,Read More could he get his bicycle fixed at the village Department of Public Works.
Paul Williams June 16, 2013 at 08:33 am
He also wanted to know the most effective method of spying on the other kids so he could get electedRead More Class President.
Green Farmer June 13, 2013 at 01:39 pm
Why not cut out the middle man and just send the money directly to the religious schools.
Paul Williams June 16, 2013 at 08:27 am
If they reported all their income........if every other home was not owned by a "RABBI"Read More and tax free.....if they returned all the books and learning materials they "borrowed" .......ETC ETC.....Get real Weeder.
Green Farmer June 13, 2013 at 01:42 pm
It will never happen.
M. Leybra June 16, 2013 at 07:25 pm
Shouldn't be happening in the first place & "requiring" another law to stop rippingRead More off Joe Blow taxpayer for county government elite, disgusting.
Champs pose for a picture (photo by Craig Fetterman)
Kevin Zawacki (Editor) June 12, 2013 at 11:03 am
Congratulations to the Cubs!
Scott F. June 12, 2013 at 11:35 am
The boys were awesome last night and all season long, a well deserved Championship for a great groupRead More of boys
Lisa Buchman (Editor) June 13, 2013 at 11:20 am
Fantastic! Just posted the photo on New City Facebook too!
Aerial of United Water's proposed water treatment plant
Tom Nimick June 11, 2013 at 09:23 pm
Mr. Pointing says that an issues conference is unusual. The unusual step is called for because thisRead More project is highly unusual; it is unprecedented. This French-owned water company wants to implement its pet technology at our expense - it makes sense for the company because the project makes lots of money. There is information available that calls into question the "definitive" studies carried out by the water company. Of course they found that their technology was the best option - what a surprise! They have not made the case that they carried out a disinterested examination of the issues in the public interest. Yes there are still issues. Also, stop threatening us with increased costs from delay. First, it does not make sense and second, you are trying to bully us into accepting your proposal. That is one more sign that something is wrong in your proposal.
John Taggart June 13, 2013 at 08:08 am
An issues conference will be a wast of time and money. So many ' issues ' have been pulled out ofRead More thin air. The people who organized against the plant will just keep saying the same thing. No amount of info will be enough, no answer will be accepted. The issues conference will be a circus of endless questions, ideas, and demands. Haverstraw bay reclassified as drinking water will better protect it, provide an endless supply of water and finally help end the stereotype of the Hudson being polluted Recommend
mike sullivan June 11, 2013 at 08:14 pm
get a life
Tom Nimick June 11, 2013 at 09:12 pm
There were no open meetings. I attended the April meeting and Mr. Lettre was directed by the TownRead More Board to return with more precise estimates and to include options for other upgrades. I have attended every meeting of the Town Board since that time and Mr. Lettre never returned in an open meeting. Mr. Borelli indicated that Mr. Lettre had addressed his concerns directly and privately. According to the Open Meetings Law, the deliberations of the Town Board are to be open and visible to the public. Private individual meetings or communications with members of the Town Board so as to avoid open deliberations flouts the intent of the Open Meetings Law. Mr. Gromack's statement of other meetings is inaccurate and, since it was specifically in response to a question about open meetings, dishonest. Mr. Borelli, shame on you for accepting a private communication and not standing by your guidance to Mr. Lettre that he was to come back to an open meeting of the Town Board.
Watchdog June 17, 2013 at 04:27 pm
Borelli and Ho -Man are in the bag for Lettre. They are not Republicans...just political hacks forRead More Lettre. RINOS.
galledeb June 10, 2013 at 10:45 am
How can I get more information? When and where are auditions?
Maddie June 10, 2013 at 04:25 pm
You can contact Pastor Robin at rdemaggio@ramapocentral.org
Tracy Urvater June 13, 2013 at 09:25 am
What are the dates of this camp?
Cicadas emerging from their 17 year slumber.
Kevin Zawacki (Editor) June 9, 2013 at 09:32 pm
Thanks for sharing, Grace! Your thoughts on their noise?
Grace Anthony Zemsky June 10, 2013 at 09:00 am
The traffic from the nearby Palisades Parkway is more of a noise nuisance than the cicada chorus.Read More (We have triple-paned windows because of it.) There is something almost musical about the hum of the cicadas. Of course, it may bother me more if I lived in the "affected area" and heard it constantly. Upon entering this nearby neighborhood, the sound crescendos. And yet, it can't be heard a couple of streets away. The drone of locusts is more bothersome than these 17 year cicadas.
Coleen Crowe June 10, 2013 at 01:30 pm
There are swarms of them at my house in upper nyack. Take a ride down Broadway in Upper Nyack nearRead More Nyack beach and they are super loud.
Linda June 8, 2013 at 10:39 am
I missed this! Is there still a way to get a signed copy? Maybe he will do another signing?
John Murphy June 11, 2013 at 08:20 am
This is the most accurate word picture of one of the tragic corollary side effects of one ofRead More humanities ' gruesome failings , which is war. Thank you Pam Sitomer for putting your writing genius to work for a noble cause.