''Believe none of what you hear, and half of what you see'' Benjamin Franklin - especially if it comes from Malone, Hull or Nimick

I just finished reading many different items from the above mentioned.  
Mr. Nimick -You put yourself out there as this honest trustworthy man  looking to clean up politics and if that were the truth I would applaud you.  but unfortunately you can't be trusted to tell the whole truth.  You stated how, at the town board meeting, when Mr. Ballard asked for the constituent representative position to be voted on all he said was that he needed someone to answer phones during a storm.  Be truthful - Is that all he said? Mr. Ballard made a lengthily explanation to the town board that included various tasks the position was and has  under taken. As for the salary, again, Mr. Ballard in detail paralleled this position with other constituent representative positions that are political appointments and because it was just straight salary with no benefits at all, more economical then the existing..this very issue was repeated and taped by mr hull at numerous civic meetings including Nanuet and Bardonia.  Furthermore, it was published on the patch. Mr Nimick please be honest, do your homework and seek all of the the truth not just what you want to see. 
Mr. Nimick,  also stated that what  puzzles him is why Wayne Ballard would have made this foolish political decision to hire Mr. Sparaco.   Mr. Ballard, as Mr. Hull points out, was already widely respected for his work - at least at that point in time. 
 
Here you go putting words in people's mouth. It was not a political decision it was a needed position as approved by town board and  if the name wasn't Frank Sparaco, would we be having this conversation? Again, as explained by Mr. Ballard, unlike Savino, candidates were screened.   Frank Sparaco was the best candidate He held the  very same position for the NYS Assembly.  Mr. Ballard had always complemented Mr. Sparacos hard work and loyalty and this came about when they worked together in 2011 election cycle being that they both where in the same primaries.

The question I would like you to answer for me is why is it ok for Mr Malone and Councilman Borelli to try to secure the working families line by trying to get Frank to work for them?  I know you are going to respond we haven't seen the unedited tapes.  well I have and I know it is true.  But even without seeing the tapes I still ask the same question of Mr. Nimick or Mr Hull or Mr. Malone.  What was the reason for Malone to be in a meeting with Frank Sparaco?  Nobody wants to answer that one.  Your squeaky clean boyscout  has gotten his hands dirty.

As for all Mr Malone' s cost savings  its easy to state price differences when you don't compare apples to apples.  I am currently looking into Malones so called claims of cost savings and will bet you dollars to doughnuts that he is actually costing the town more money in the long run.
Just looking for the truth, The Whole truth  not just the part that infers wrongdoing on your oposition