.
Feedback

Cancelled: Attend Public Meeting On Biomass Waste-to-Energy Plant

Stony Point Planning Board holds a scoping hearing on the proposed gasification plant for Holt Drive on Wednesday, Feb. 20.

Editor's Note: This meeting was cancelled at the request of the applicant and will be rescheduled.

To the editor, 

The Stony Point Planning Board will begin its pubic scoping hearing on Wed. Feb. 20 at the RHO Building on Clubhouse Lane on the proposed Biomass Waste-to-Energy "Gasification" Plant being proposed for Holt Drive Industrial Park in what is called the “Hudson View in Bldg. D” application. Written public comments can be submitted to the board until February 27. 

SPACE was asked by developer, Patrick Magee and MBC Construction to hear a presentation on the plan several months ago.  At that time, SPACE met with one of the potential companies that would operate the gasification plant if approved. We were impressed with the leading edge technology and Dr. James Cervino, who is a scientist at Woods Hole, MA, has volunteered himself as a consultant for this project and has appeared several times before the Stony Point Planning Board on behalf of the project. 

SPACE is not opposing this project and believes that the advanced "gasification" process being proposed is cutting edge technology that will provide both environmental and economic benefits for Stony Point. However, SPACE has also requested and expects the town to approve its request to be admitted as an "interested party" in the SEQRA environmental review process.

This project has great potential economic and environmental benefits for the Town of Stony Point. At the same time, we welcome the participation and scrutiny of the project by the lead agency, the Town of Stony Point Planning Board. As we have said we must involve the NYS Department of Environmental Conservation, which has the

health and environmental oversight and permit approval authority. They are now involved with the process. The Town of Haverstraw has also raised some objections, which should be addressed during the SEQRA review. 

UPDATE:

Last month, the Stony Point Planning Board declared itself Lead Agency and that it is going to do a "coordinated review" of the project with the NYS Department of Environmental Conservation (NYS DEC). The project was determined to be a TYPE 1 ACTION under the NYS SEQRA environmental review process. That means that it could have a significant environmental impact and will need to go through a public scoping session to identify what those impacts might be.

What is Scoping?

Scoping provides an important opportunity for town residents and others to identify environmental questions or issues that it wants the applicant to answer in its DEIS - Draft Environmental Impact Statement. If issues are not identified, they may not be included in the review. Therefore, SPACE encourages all interested parties to attend the: 

Scoping Public Hearing

Wednesday, February 20, 2013 at 7pm 

Location: Rho Building, located on Clubhouse Lane; Stony Point, NY 

Written comments: 

Submitted by Wednesday, February 27 to: planning@townofstonypoint.org

The Planning Board will then meet for its regular monthly meeting on Thursday, Feb. 28 at 7PM at the Rho Building to review input received. 

A number of issues have been raised by the DEC and the Town of Haverstraw and others agencies including:

1. The DEC has issued warnings of "segmentation" to the Stony Point Planning Board and expects the applicant to look at the proposal in total, more comprehensively. Some wetlands access and further expansion of the Magee industrial park needs to be considered more completely during the SEQRA review process.

2. The expected capacity of the facility is between 1,000 - 4,000 tons per day. Although the applicant wants to bring biomass (trash) in by rail, it will have to be trucked in by road until then. Through their attorney, Mr. Silverberg, the Town of Haverstraw and some residents and businesses have raised traffic issues and the size of the facility eventually needed if it grows to 4,000 tons per day.

3. The DEC's role and review process for addressing air and water impacts and significant input for required permits. 

Please print and review the Pos Dec and DRAFT Scoping Document at the link below. Does it address all the environmental issues you want addressed in SEQR? 

If not, submit your comments for what needs to be added during scoping:

Hudson River View Building D Waste to Energy Facility SEQR Materials http://www.townofstonypoint.org/userfiles/file/Hudson%20River%20View%20Waste%20to%20Energy%20Pos%20Dec%20and%20Draft%20Scope.pdf

We hope to see you at the SCOPING PUBLIC HEARING on FEB 20 at 7PM.

George Potanovic Jr.
Stony Point

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from New City Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something

asdf

ad
asd
Announcements  

0   Recommend Sandeip Yadav

asd
Kathleen May 21, 2013 at 08:55 am
CANDLE Night at the Rockland Boulders Game Join CANDLE for a fun(d)raising game on May 23rd as theRead More Rockland Boulders take on the Trois-Rivieres Aigles. Proceeds from tickets purchased through CANDLE* will support programs that educate & empower youth and reduce substance abuse and violence in Rockland County and beyond.
Heywood Jablohme May 21, 2013 at 02:48 pm
I agree with most of your points, but surely you are not implying that teachers are expected toRead More produce funding to correct school roofs, right? I think you got a bit off topic here, but I agree that our educational infrastructure is in disrepair and is in desperate need of rehabilitation. Maybe if our teacher's unions allowed a little more leeway we could allocate funding a little more appropriately and fund the important things instead of overpaying paying dinosaur teachers who lost interest a long time ago and fight any and all forms of teacher benchmarking.
WGMom May 20, 2013 at 09:10 am
It's entirely true that every professional has out-of-pocket expenses. But as someone who worked asRead More a corporate trainer, I can guarantee you I NEVER had to pay out of pocket expenses for supplies to teach classes. Every piece of paper, supply, and even snacks for the participants were fully covered expenses. If I had to spend out of pocket money to procure supplies, I could submit for a reimbursement, and receive it, no questions asked. I am now in school to become a high school teacher and I can see the stark difference in how the education of folks in a corporate environment is incredibly different, and privileged, than the public school environment. I've sat through numerous classes in the Clarkstown and Ramapo districts, doing observations required for my education certification, and while Clarkstown certainly benefits from certain advantages, the shabbiness of being a public school is still there. Furniture, such as teacher desks, that looks like it was purchased in a garage sale 30 years ago... faculty bathrooms that are dark and dingy, nearly crumbling, and sorely in need of updating. Etc. The public expects teachers to have professional training, act professionally, but they lack sometimes basic resources and are expected to function in an environment that feels more like a dungeon than an institution of learning. The citizens of Clarkstown, if they could get a tour of some of the facilities they are expecting children to learn in, and teachers to teach in, would be very surprised. We do supply some great technology, but then we put it in classrooms with windows that won't stay closed when it's windy, as one example. I spent most of my time in South, which is the best of the bunch, facilities-wise. Clarkstown North is a mess, Woodglen's woods are littered with fallen trees no one's cleaned up after Sandy, Laurel Plains had to be shuttered thanks to that whole foul stench... the district is in a situation where there are major capital improvements that are going to be needed. Buildings are aging, and it seems it's only the most basic of upkeep that happens. The district can't even fix the roofs of the buildings without applying for a state grant.
Heywood Jablohme May 18, 2013 at 07:17 am
What professional doesn't spend $500 per year on out of pocket expenses related to their jobs?Read More Staples offering 10% (or 5 in some cases) is hardly an example of the community getting involved. Thankfully, there are other examples of the community and PTA's getting involved and providing needed services. Clarkstown and surrounding areas hardly have substantial unmet needs in their classroom, thankfully.
Truth4all May 16, 2013 at 11:37 am
I guess better late than never. LaCorte is serving his 4th year as Mayor and was Trustee for I thinkRead More 4 years before that. This year is the only time he has brought the idea to the village about participating in this program. He is motivated by the opportunity of getting positive press for his County Executive campaign. The village should have been involved in this program ( as well as the Americorps program) long before this. On a positive note, hopefully the Village will continue this worthwhile partnership for many years to come.
Sunny May 16, 2013 at 03:50 pm
Is there an article on patch about it? I am unable to find except on lohud.com
Green Farmer May 15, 2013 at 08:23 pm
Finally!!
b May 15, 2013 at 07:31 pm
Thank God. It's been a long time coming. Finally someone has paid attention.!!! That man has gotRead More to go.