.
Feedback

Center for Safety & Change Issues Statement about Kasandra Perkins' Murder

More than 1,100 women are killed each year by an intimate partner.

 

Dear Editor:

Sunday morning, December 2nd, we awoke to national news reports of a woman murdered by her famous boyfriend. He killed his girlfriend-- the mother of their 3-month-old daughter-- in the early hours of the morning.  He pulled out a gun and shot her in front of his infant daughter and his own mother.  He then drove to his workplace and fatally shot himself in the parking lot after apologizing to his bosses.

The victim’s name was Kasandra Perkins, and her murderer was Jovan Belcher, a linebacker for the NFL’s Kansas City Chiefs.  Their three-month-old daughter, Zoey, is now an orphan.  Family and friends lives were destroyed instantly, needlessly.    

As often happens when a woman is murdered by her intimate partner, the public at large immediately began searching for reasons to explain or excuse the perpetrator’s behavior. We first did as we are trained: we sought to blame the victim; looking to see if she were somehow responsible for “setting off” her intimate partner, putting herself in harm’s way. Finding nothing there we began looking for external factors – mental illness, substance abuse, anger management issues.

Since the perpetrator in this case was an NFL player, the pundits latched on to ”traumatic brain injury” – the result of concussions, head injuries and the violence endemic to the sport of football – to explain this horrific murder.  We believe the facts will prove otherwise. 

Over the past 40 years, considerable effort has been spent to understand domestic violence (also known as intimate partner violence), an issue former Surgeon General C. Everet Koop labeled the single most important health problem facing women. Statistics show that one in three women will experience violence by an intimate partner in her lifetime.  According to the Bureau of Justice Statistics, approximately one-third of female murder victims aged 12 or older (consistently well over 1,100 women and girls per year) are killed by an intimate partner. Murders of women have become so commonplace that many statisticians have adopted a new term, “femicide”, to more succinctly describe the phenomenon.

So do all men and boys who batter, control and/or ultimately murder their intimate partners have traumatic brain injury, anger management issues or one of the other myriad of problems used since the beginning of written history to excuse gender-based violence against women?  Of course not. The root cause of this type of violence is pervasive and much closer at hand; we only have to have the courage to name it.

First let’s define the problem: Domestic/intimate partner violence is a pattern of coercive and intimidating behaviors, emotional, sexual, psychological, physical and financial, used by one intimate partner to control another.  We cannot take credit for this definition; it has evolved as a universal understanding among survivors of domestic violence, the professionals who service them, governmental agencies, law enforcement and the medical community. The same consensus has been built to acknowledge the simple truth as to the cause of this behavior.

This is not an issue of one or more “bad men”. Rather, these behaviors are learned/accepted by all of us. They are historically rooted in our society and are supported by traditions, belief systems, attitudes and practices that have established and perpetuated men’s privilege for centuries, together with the concomitant devaluation and marginalization of women.  Until we broaden this consensus around this simple truth throughout our communities and all of our institutions, we will never be capable of reducing and ultimately ending violence against women and girls. 

We recognize the massive scope of changes needed to create this consensus and ultimately end gender-based violence.   It will not happen overnight. But by working together, perhaps we can create a tipping point where patterns of behavior that support mistreatment, abuse and violence toward women and girls will no longer be tolerated.  We owe it to Kasandra Perkins; to Zoey, and to all victims and survivors of domestic/intimate partner violence.

If you are interested in helping or for more information, please contact the Center for Safety & Change:  845-634-3391.

Carolyn Fish
Executive Director

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from New City Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
WGMom May 20, 2013 at 09:10 am
It's entirely true that every professional has out-of-pocket expenses. But as someone who worked asRead More a corporate trainer, I can guarantee you I NEVER had to pay out of pocket expenses for supplies to teach classes. Every piece of paper, supply, and even snacks for the participants were fully covered expenses. If I had to spend out of pocket money to procure supplies, I could submit for a reimbursement, and receive it, no questions asked. I am now in school to become a high school teacher and I can see the stark difference in how the education of folks in a corporate environment is incredibly different, and privileged, than the public school environment. I've sat through numerous classes in the Clarkstown and Ramapo districts, doing observations required for my education certification, and while Clarkstown certainly benefits from certain advantages, the shabbiness of being a public school is still there. Furniture, such as teacher desks, that looks like it was purchased in a garage sale 30 years ago... faculty bathrooms that are dark and dingy, nearly crumbling, and sorely in need of updating. Etc. The public expects teachers to have professional training, act professionally, but they lack sometimes basic resources and are expected to function in an environment that feels more like a dungeon than an institution of learning. The citizens of Clarkstown, if they could get a tour of some of the facilities they are expecting children to learn in, and teachers to teach in, would be very surprised. We do supply some great technology, but then we put it in classrooms with windows that won't stay closed when it's windy, as one example. I spent most of my time in South, which is the best of the bunch, facilities-wise. Clarkstown North is a mess, Woodglen's woods are littered with fallen trees no one's cleaned up after Sandy, Laurel Plains had to be shuttered thanks to that whole foul stench... the district is in a situation where there are major capital improvements that are going to be needed. Buildings are aging, and it seems it's only the most basic of upkeep that happens. The district can't even fix the roofs of the buildings without applying for a state grant.
Heywood Jablohme May 18, 2013 at 07:17 am
What professional doesn't spend $500 per year on out of pocket expenses related to their jobs?Read More Staples offering 10% (or 5 in some cases) is hardly an example of the community getting involved. Thankfully, there are other examples of the community and PTA's getting involved and providing needed services. Clarkstown and surrounding areas hardly have substantial unmet needs in their classroom, thankfully.
Truth4all May 16, 2013 at 11:37 am
I guess better late than never. LaCorte is serving his 4th year as Mayor and was Trustee for I thinkRead More 4 years before that. This year is the only time he has brought the idea to the village about participating in this program. He is motivated by the opportunity of getting positive press for his County Executive campaign. The village should have been involved in this program ( as well as the Americorps program) long before this. On a positive note, hopefully the Village will continue this worthwhile partnership for many years to come.
Sunny May 16, 2013 at 03:50 pm
Is there an article on patch about it? I am unable to find except on lohud.com
Green Farmer May 15, 2013 at 08:23 pm
Finally!!
b May 15, 2013 at 07:31 pm
Thank God. It's been a long time coming. Finally someone has paid attention.!!! That man has gotRead More to go.
Watchdog May 16, 2013 at 04:37 pm
George, don't you have enough to do straightening out the affairs of Clarkstown. Overtime in theRead More Police Department is rampant and the Town Attorney is out of control. As Tom Nimick says, we need an outside auditor for that operation since taxpayers were abused with the hiring of a political operative Jay Savino who I understand is singing like a canary. Get on the right side George before the FBI comes a lookin" I hear that the Gromack war chest is the first place they are looking for clues. Do the right thing George or you will get trampled with the rest of them.
Tom Nimick May 15, 2013 at 11:12 pm
Congratulations, George. Now about your other responsibilities as a member of the Town Board withRead More primary oversight over budget and expenditures: Won't you be the one to propose the needed audit of the Office of Town Attorney? You know the problems exist - likely you know more about the problems than I do. It is sad to see you silent in the face of the abuse of patronage. When will we hear your voice on it?
Teacher May 16, 2013 at 07:24 am
The new format is attractive but it is hard to find the comments that go with stories.