.
Feedback

Community Downzoning In Clarkstown

Town board's accessory housing proposal will diminish property rights and values.

 

Dear Editor:

Clarkstown residents are about to face a new deception by our elected and appointed officials, by way of their new master plan to change the character of our town, at the next town board meeting on Oct. 2nd. Most everyone who lives here, moved or remains in this community because this area was built on the concept of predominantly single family homes.

The insidious pronouncement by elected representatives to change most of the zoning in our town, to have us comply with a new mandate on accessory housing will only diminish our property rights and values. Their marketing plan was first touted as a means to provide affordable housing for volunteer emergency first responders, claiming the demand and need was so great, they took title to a condo in Nanuet and put taxpayers on the hook for  $650.00 a month Yet it took them a year, paying for an empty apt. to place a tenant.

They have now shifted their deception on the backs of our senior citizens, enticing them to become landlords to raise additional income to pay for the ever increasing taxes levied by them. Naturally, none of them want to explain to these seniors all the negative aspects of this endeavor.

Making seniors spend tens of thousands of dollars to convert their homes with possibly complying with HUD inspections and all their requirements. Begs the question Why?

Putting seniors in a dilemma of being at the mercy of living with tenants who could be sex or drug offenders, illegal immigrants or simply tenants who won’t pay their rent, is appalling.  Leaving these seniors at peril to spend additional money to evict the individuals and costing them even more in lost rent and or property damage. Wow even if they do increase their income ,it could put them in jeopardy of losing their enhanced Star Rebate because they breached the income threshold limit 

All of this is of no concern to the town, after all this will give them only more tax revenue when anyone improves their property  To add additional insult to our residents, part of implementing this new master plan of zoning changes is to create Neighborhood Shopping Zones, to provide developers additional revenue to create more accessory housing above commercial buildings up to three floors.

This will only create a flood of HUD housing to permeate our community, thereby mimicking what our neighbors look like as in Spring Valley, Haverstraw or what the landscape of the town of Ramapo is becoming. I guess our town leaders, who on more than one occasion have said, well you elected me so I believe “I know what’s best for you “and you’re going to like it no matter what.

So this town will justify the spending tens of millions of dollars, to make us a walkable community, but needs bodies to sit in the dozens of $1,000 purchased park benches, spreading thru-out the town. Limited accessory housing already exists in town. We don’t need any blanket downzoning to change the face of Clarkstown forever.

Now is your only last chance to stand up and defeat this treacherous behavior at town hall on October 2nd.  Their shrewd attempt at a third public hearing is disguised as a feeble attempt to address your concerns, while they will have already in hand, this repulsive law which they intend to pass.

Only all of you can prevent this forest fire from spreading. Don’t let them politically spin this ,so you swallow this spoon fed derelict agenda, you’ll only regret the upset stomach later. Tell them “YOU CAN’T FIX STUPID “or maybe you should just sit home and watch the coming reality of your inaction and whine later.

Sincerely, 
Frank Grandel
New City

Very well said!!!Frank the clowns in the town think park benchs make a better townI wrote the following as to what to do with the pfizer property. a wonderful vision for the pfizer property would be a college campus consisting of different colleges..sort of a downstate campus for as many colleges that we could attract..it could be specialized for some of the colleges..it could include dorms..the many buildings of pfizer have been outfitted for the sciences so why not use that base or retrofit some..a KEY ASPECT IS THAT THERE IS A RAILWAY BEHIND THE PROPERTY THAT IS CONNECTED TO NYC ,NEW JERSEY..just add another small station and bingo!! you are now connected to millions of possible students without needing cars!!!a downstate multi college could be a SOLUTION for many students who CANNOT afford to go away to a 4 year college for the whole time..so say 2 years on this campus then 2 away. perhaps a medical college funded by various countrys for their students..with the stipulation that students have to do residency for 4 years upon graduation.many aspects...and wheni contacted REDC the answer i was given was" We cant afford to lose our tax base"!wow amzing answer .what better to leave it empty in this new economic era??Rockland isnt on the we have to be there list for many companies.alot of vacancys in NJ closer to major commercial highways and ports..rockland is rockland..but a campus consisting of many different colleges with MASS TRANSIT could be a Cornerstone .
Lynn Teger September 26, 2012 at 03:19 am
http://archive.constantcontact.com/fs086/1101448807983/archive/1111083764464.html
Mary September 26, 2012 at 09:56 am
The proposed local law can be found at... http://www.town.clarkstown.ny.us/PDF/Local_Laws/ACCES%20HOUSING%20LAW.pdf
As Frank stated, the public hearing that is going to be held on October 2nd is the board's third attempt at approving a zoning change to permit accessory housing (which is another term for low-income housing). Everyone that stood up and spoke at the last two public hearings expressed their disapproval of this zoning change. Yet, instead of acknowledging that the taxpayers do not want to have accessory housing in their neighborhoods, the board continues to "tweek" the law thinking that it will make any difference. As the law stands, the homeowner must be 60 years of age and be in the county for 20 years. Once this law is on the books, what would stop the board from revisiting the law and removing those requirements and permitting anyone to have an accessory apartment? While the law states that the property must be owner-occupied, how is that going to be enforced? 26 years ago my husband and I were told we wouldn't be able to afford New City...but, we sacrificed and did whatever we could because we wanted to live in a neighborhood with single family homes. I don't want to see our neighborhoods turned into affordable housing communities. Our home values have fallen as it is, allowing the zoning change to permit accessory housing (a/k/a accessory dwelling unit) will reduce them even further.
Richard September 26, 2012 at 02:19 pm
Wow. The Pfizer property as a college or vocational institute with an integrated commuter rail system. Now that's an idea worth looking into.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from New City Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Jimmy R June 14, 2013 at 05:10 pm
The first thing little Frankie wanted to know was that since he was mayor of Suffern for the day,Read More could he get his bicycle fixed at the village Department of Public Works.
Paul Williams June 16, 2013 at 08:33 am
He also wanted to know the most effective method of spying on the other kids so he could get electedRead More Class President.
Green Farmer June 13, 2013 at 01:39 pm
Why not cut out the middle man and just send the money directly to the religious schools.
Paul Williams June 16, 2013 at 08:27 am
If they reported all their income........if every other home was not owned by a "RABBI"Read More and tax free.....if they returned all the books and learning materials they "borrowed" .......ETC ETC.....Get real Weeder.
Green Farmer June 13, 2013 at 01:42 pm
It will never happen.
M. Leybra June 16, 2013 at 07:25 pm
Shouldn't be happening in the first place & "requiring" another law to stop rippingRead More off Joe Blow taxpayer for county government elite, disgusting.
Champs pose for a picture (photo by Craig Fetterman)
Kevin Zawacki (Editor) June 12, 2013 at 11:03 am
Congratulations to the Cubs!
Scott F. June 12, 2013 at 11:35 am
The boys were awesome last night and all season long, a well deserved Championship for a great groupRead More of boys
Lisa Buchman (Editor) June 13, 2013 at 11:20 am
Fantastic! Just posted the photo on New City Facebook too!
Aerial of United Water's proposed water treatment plant
Tom Nimick June 11, 2013 at 09:23 pm
Mr. Pointing says that an issues conference is unusual. The unusual step is called for because thisRead More project is highly unusual; it is unprecedented. This French-owned water company wants to implement its pet technology at our expense - it makes sense for the company because the project makes lots of money. There is information available that calls into question the "definitive" studies carried out by the water company. Of course they found that their technology was the best option - what a surprise! They have not made the case that they carried out a disinterested examination of the issues in the public interest. Yes there are still issues. Also, stop threatening us with increased costs from delay. First, it does not make sense and second, you are trying to bully us into accepting your proposal. That is one more sign that something is wrong in your proposal.
John Taggart June 13, 2013 at 08:08 am
An issues conference will be a wast of time and money. So many ' issues ' have been pulled out ofRead More thin air. The people who organized against the plant will just keep saying the same thing. No amount of info will be enough, no answer will be accepted. The issues conference will be a circus of endless questions, ideas, and demands. Haverstraw bay reclassified as drinking water will better protect it, provide an endless supply of water and finally help end the stereotype of the Hudson being polluted Recommend
mike sullivan June 11, 2013 at 08:14 pm
get a life
Tom Nimick June 11, 2013 at 09:12 pm
There were no open meetings. I attended the April meeting and Mr. Lettre was directed by the TownRead More Board to return with more precise estimates and to include options for other upgrades. I have attended every meeting of the Town Board since that time and Mr. Lettre never returned in an open meeting. Mr. Borelli indicated that Mr. Lettre had addressed his concerns directly and privately. According to the Open Meetings Law, the deliberations of the Town Board are to be open and visible to the public. Private individual meetings or communications with members of the Town Board so as to avoid open deliberations flouts the intent of the Open Meetings Law. Mr. Gromack's statement of other meetings is inaccurate and, since it was specifically in response to a question about open meetings, dishonest. Mr. Borelli, shame on you for accepting a private communication and not standing by your guidance to Mr. Lettre that he was to come back to an open meeting of the Town Board.
Watchdog June 17, 2013 at 04:27 pm
Borelli and Ho -Man are in the bag for Lettre. They are not Republicans...just political hacks forRead More Lettre. RINOS.
galledeb June 10, 2013 at 10:45 am
How can I get more information? When and where are auditions?
Maddie June 10, 2013 at 04:25 pm
You can contact Pastor Robin at rdemaggio@ramapocentral.org
Tracy Urvater June 13, 2013 at 09:25 am
What are the dates of this camp?
Cicadas emerging from their 17 year slumber.
Kevin Zawacki (Editor) June 9, 2013 at 09:32 pm
Thanks for sharing, Grace! Your thoughts on their noise?
Grace Anthony Zemsky June 10, 2013 at 09:00 am
The traffic from the nearby Palisades Parkway is more of a noise nuisance than the cicada chorus.Read More (We have triple-paned windows because of it.) There is something almost musical about the hum of the cicadas. Of course, it may bother me more if I lived in the "affected area" and heard it constantly. Upon entering this nearby neighborhood, the sound crescendos. And yet, it can't be heard a couple of streets away. The drone of locusts is more bothersome than these 17 year cicadas.
Coleen Crowe June 10, 2013 at 01:30 pm
There are swarms of them at my house in upper nyack. Take a ride down Broadway in Upper Nyack nearRead More Nyack beach and they are super loud.
Linda June 8, 2013 at 10:39 am
I missed this! Is there still a way to get a signed copy? Maybe he will do another signing?
John Murphy June 11, 2013 at 08:20 am
This is the most accurate word picture of one of the tragic corollary side effects of one ofRead More humanities ' gruesome failings , which is war. Thank you Pam Sitomer for putting your writing genius to work for a noble cause.