.
Feedback

Accessory Housing Explanation

Clarkstown Town Planner addresses concerns about proposed Senior Accessory Housing law.

 

Dear Editor:

Please accept this letter in response to the “Community Downzoning in Clarkstown” opinion article published in the Patch on September 25, 2012.  Mr. Grandel’s description of the Clarkstown Senior Accessory Housing Law has several inaccuracies which I would like to clarify for your readers.

It should be noted that accessory housing is not a new concept.  The proposed law is based on a similar law enacted in Orangetown, which has been in effect for 30 years. The purpose of the proposed law, first and foremost, is to provide seniors the ability to stay in their own homes.

In the surveys conducted as a part of the 2002 Housing Study and 2009 Comprehensive Plan seniors overwhelmingly preferred aging in their own home. Accessory housing was identified as a way to facilitate this for some seniors. Accessory apartments provide seniors with supplemental income, as well as possible assistance with property maintenance and the sense of security that comes from having others living nearby.

The proposed Senior Accessory Housing Law does not “make seniors spend tens of thousands of dollars to convert their homes … putting seniors at the mercy of living with tenants.” This program is entirely voluntary.  It simply provides an option that a senior may or may not wish to pursue.

The 2002 Housing Study and 2009 Comprehensive Plan also recognized that housing within the Town is unaffordable for young adults who are typically just starting in the workforce.  Of particular concern are young emergency service volunteers, who after receiving their training and devoting a few years with their company or corps, are opting to move out of the Town because of the high cost of living.

To address this problem, the Town has established a program via the Town’s Senior Citizen Coordinator to match seniors interested in renting to emergency service volunteers. The proposed law and accompanying program are completely voluntary on the part of the seniors and volunteers, but provides options to both parties.

The Senior Accessory Housing Law and any apartments created as a result of the law are not affiliated with any Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) program. Accessory apartments, by their nature, are generally affordable as compared to other housing options available in the Town.  A review of available apartments located in two-family residences in the Town revealed that rents are typically in the range of $800 to $1,200. Therefore there was no need to strictly regulate rents to ensure that they be affordable.  The law leaves the rents completely within the discretion of the homeowner.

The proposed law is not downzoning. Accessory apartments must be subordinate to the one-family use and must not have separate metering. The residence must continue to appear to be a single-family dwelling. 

The accessory apartment must be located wholly within the principal building and be a minimum of 400 square feet and a maximum of 800 square feet and not exceed 1 bedroom. The local law limits the number of occupants to 2.  The homeowner would have to be an individual or a couple, one of which is at least 60 years old and have owned and occupied a home in Clarkstown for at least 20 years.

The law also limits the number of apartments town-wide to 200, approximately the number of units that have been developed in Orangetown in the past 30 years.  It was considered prudent to start with a limited number of apartments to gauge the interest of the qualifying seniors

The Town has presented this draft law at several Town Board workshops and held public hearings at the Town Board meetings of July 24, 2012 and August 21, 2012.  In addition, a special public informational session was held on September 10, 2012 with a group of concerned residents, Mr. Grandel among them, during which all of the preceding information was presented.  I hope this helps your readers to better understand the proposed Senior Accessory Housing Law which will again be considered by the Town Board at their meeting of October 2.

Sincerely,
Joe Simoes
Clarkstown Town Planner

Maureen October 1, 2012 at 11:28 am
Simoes says
"The purpose of the proposed law, first and foremost, is to provide seniors the ability to stay in their own homes" Sure like this couple .... Teresa Mastropolo, 81, a Valley Cottage woman and her husband, Carmine, 88, a World War II veteran have had to tap into their life's savings to pay their taxes this year while the Town gave a $75,000 part time job to Frank Sparaco from the county legislature to answer the telephone and $84,000 to Jay Savino, the head of the GOP in the Bronx, to fill out tax cert forms.   See the last part of this article.  http://www.lohud.com/article/20120929/NEWS03/309280097/Clarkstown-may-defy-tax-cap-blames-Rockland-County Why are people losing the ability to stay in their home?   You lot in the town hall are more interested in paying fat pensions to high paid CSEA and police than protecting the low paying pensions and meagre savings of World War II vets! Why not advise residents that a better idea than ripping their homes apart to fit in boarders would be to go to the bank and take out a reverse mortgage on their home!   They can reverse mortgage their homes to pay for those taking out mortgages in their retirement homes in Florida. That's a plan!
frankie g October 1, 2012 at 11:36 am
just because a law has been on the books for 20 or 30 years somewhere else doesn't make it justified or correct. Yes it doesn't make seniors spend tens of thousands,but they may be spending that to convert their homes A simple renovation could amount to double or triple what our seniors are paying now in taxes This law in no way shape or form helps to protect seniors,it only puts them at more peril living with potential deviants who may not pay any rent. There are too many downsides seniors need to consider before embarking on this misdirection the town is offering them Look ,the town is running a deficit budget They are looking for anyway to raise more in taxes and anyone who chooses to do this will pay more to the town
frankie g October 1, 2012 at 11:42 am
I might add,any law a government passes with any restrictions can easily be relaxed in the future,simply hiding it in a town bored agenda and granting blanket approval
Robin Traum (Editor) October 1, 2012 at 12:22 pm
Frankie
New City Patch will have an article today on the agenda items for Tuesday's Clarkstown Town Board Meeting. Robin
Joe Ciardullo October 1, 2012 at 12:38 pm
Fix the real problem of ever increasing taxes. Town taxes will increase at least 6.2% (I predict much more once the Palisades mall wins a tax reduction), County another 25-30%, School at least 2%. Taking in a boarder will not fix this problem.
Rockland moved up to the #3 highest taxed count in the nation. Fix that problem and people will be able to afford living here, and be able to stay in their homes. Unfortunately, the current leadership of the town has not made much progress on reducing expenses.
Mary October 1, 2012 at 04:48 pm
There are several of comments made by Mr. Simoes I would like to address:
"It should be noted that accessory housing is not a new concept." This is true, since there are already properties in the Town of Clarkstown with a "Parcel Type" listed as "1 Fmly, yr/rnd Acsry Apt" The rezoning of neighborhoods of only single family homes to neighborhoods of multi-family homes is what's new. "...are not affiliated with any Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) program." No HUD involved? Then why did HUD issue a publication specifically supporting Accessory Dwelling Units in 2008.... http://www.huduser.org/portal/publications/adu.pdf "Accessory apartments must be subordinate to the one-family use and must not have separate metering." Who does that benefit? "It was considered prudent to start with a limited number of apartments to gauge the interest of the qualifying seniors". I attended the special meeting...which I want to thank the Town for having. At that meeting, we were told that 5 seniors are interested in applying for the accessory apartment. Why not make it possible to add the accessory apartment to their homes by whatever means (zoning board maybe) were used before. Why does the Town want to totally change the zoning?
Mary October 1, 2012 at 04:50 pm
Mr. Simoes stated that adding an accessory apartment to their home and collecting rent is an option for the senior to be able to use to stay in their home. What are the other options available to seniors to help pay their taxes?
Mary October 1, 2012 at 05:51 pm
"Accessory apartments provide seniors with supplemental income, as well as possible assistance with property maintenance and the sense of security that comes from having others living nearby."
While all that sounds really good...here's a dose of reality... http://www.ohmidog.com/2009/07/07/told-he-cant-have-dog-he-kills-the-landlord/ http://www.wsbradio.com/news/news/local/man-charged-killing-71-year-old-landlord/nF6CS/ Taking strangers into a home no matter how nice they may seem is putting yourself, as well as neighbors, at risk.
Lynn Teger October 3, 2012 at 10:33 am
One small miracle in the Town of Clarkstown.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PETJf-cYo6k&feature=youtu.be

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from New City Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Jimmy R June 14, 2013 at 05:10 pm
The first thing little Frankie wanted to know was that since he was mayor of Suffern for the day,Read More could he get his bicycle fixed at the village Department of Public Works.
Paul Williams June 16, 2013 at 08:33 am
He also wanted to know the most effective method of spying on the other kids so he could get electedRead More Class President.
Green Farmer June 13, 2013 at 01:39 pm
Why not cut out the middle man and just send the money directly to the religious schools.
Paul Williams June 16, 2013 at 08:27 am
If they reported all their income........if every other home was not owned by a "RABBI"Read More and tax free.....if they returned all the books and learning materials they "borrowed" .......ETC ETC.....Get real Weeder.
Green Farmer June 13, 2013 at 01:42 pm
It will never happen.
M. Leybra June 16, 2013 at 07:25 pm
Shouldn't be happening in the first place & "requiring" another law to stop rippingRead More off Joe Blow taxpayer for county government elite, disgusting.
Champs pose for a picture (photo by Craig Fetterman)
Kevin Zawacki (Editor) June 12, 2013 at 11:03 am
Congratulations to the Cubs!
Scott F. June 12, 2013 at 11:35 am
The boys were awesome last night and all season long, a well deserved Championship for a great groupRead More of boys
Lisa Buchman (Editor) June 13, 2013 at 11:20 am
Fantastic! Just posted the photo on New City Facebook too!
Aerial of United Water's proposed water treatment plant
Tom Nimick June 11, 2013 at 09:23 pm
Mr. Pointing says that an issues conference is unusual. The unusual step is called for because thisRead More project is highly unusual; it is unprecedented. This French-owned water company wants to implement its pet technology at our expense - it makes sense for the company because the project makes lots of money. There is information available that calls into question the "definitive" studies carried out by the water company. Of course they found that their technology was the best option - what a surprise! They have not made the case that they carried out a disinterested examination of the issues in the public interest. Yes there are still issues. Also, stop threatening us with increased costs from delay. First, it does not make sense and second, you are trying to bully us into accepting your proposal. That is one more sign that something is wrong in your proposal.
John Taggart June 13, 2013 at 08:08 am
An issues conference will be a wast of time and money. So many ' issues ' have been pulled out ofRead More thin air. The people who organized against the plant will just keep saying the same thing. No amount of info will be enough, no answer will be accepted. The issues conference will be a circus of endless questions, ideas, and demands. Haverstraw bay reclassified as drinking water will better protect it, provide an endless supply of water and finally help end the stereotype of the Hudson being polluted Recommend
mike sullivan June 11, 2013 at 08:14 pm
get a life
Tom Nimick June 11, 2013 at 09:12 pm
There were no open meetings. I attended the April meeting and Mr. Lettre was directed by the TownRead More Board to return with more precise estimates and to include options for other upgrades. I have attended every meeting of the Town Board since that time and Mr. Lettre never returned in an open meeting. Mr. Borelli indicated that Mr. Lettre had addressed his concerns directly and privately. According to the Open Meetings Law, the deliberations of the Town Board are to be open and visible to the public. Private individual meetings or communications with members of the Town Board so as to avoid open deliberations flouts the intent of the Open Meetings Law. Mr. Gromack's statement of other meetings is inaccurate and, since it was specifically in response to a question about open meetings, dishonest. Mr. Borelli, shame on you for accepting a private communication and not standing by your guidance to Mr. Lettre that he was to come back to an open meeting of the Town Board.
Watchdog June 17, 2013 at 04:27 pm
Borelli and Ho -Man are in the bag for Lettre. They are not Republicans...just political hacks forRead More Lettre. RINOS.
galledeb June 10, 2013 at 10:45 am
How can I get more information? When and where are auditions?
Maddie June 10, 2013 at 04:25 pm
You can contact Pastor Robin at rdemaggio@ramapocentral.org
Tracy Urvater June 13, 2013 at 09:25 am
What are the dates of this camp?
Cicadas emerging from their 17 year slumber.
Kevin Zawacki (Editor) June 9, 2013 at 09:32 pm
Thanks for sharing, Grace! Your thoughts on their noise?
Grace Anthony Zemsky June 10, 2013 at 09:00 am
The traffic from the nearby Palisades Parkway is more of a noise nuisance than the cicada chorus.Read More (We have triple-paned windows because of it.) There is something almost musical about the hum of the cicadas. Of course, it may bother me more if I lived in the "affected area" and heard it constantly. Upon entering this nearby neighborhood, the sound crescendos. And yet, it can't be heard a couple of streets away. The drone of locusts is more bothersome than these 17 year cicadas.
Coleen Crowe June 10, 2013 at 01:30 pm
There are swarms of them at my house in upper nyack. Take a ride down Broadway in Upper Nyack nearRead More Nyack beach and they are super loud.
Linda June 8, 2013 at 10:39 am
I missed this! Is there still a way to get a signed copy? Maybe he will do another signing?
John Murphy June 11, 2013 at 08:20 am
This is the most accurate word picture of one of the tragic corollary side effects of one ofRead More humanities ' gruesome failings , which is war. Thank you Pam Sitomer for putting your writing genius to work for a noble cause.