.
Feedback

Stony Point Board Approves New Sign Law

SPACE sees benefits of new Stony Point Sign Law but Freedom of Speech issues may lead to unequal enforcement by the town

 

Dear Editor:

In an effort to curb the increasing clutter of lawn signs and political campaign signs that have become larger and more numerous during each election season, the Stony Point Town Board voted 4-1 on Tuesday, July 10 to approve amendments to the town sign law which requires permits and limits on sign size, location and length of time – with fees of up to $350 per day and jail time for violators. 

The new law prohibits temporary signs from being placed on any town property or right of ways. As with the old law, signs may not be posted on trees, telephone poles, rocks, bridges, fences and traffic signs. Political candidates running for office must still apply for a permit, post a security deposit of $250 and homeowners are limited to only one sign per candidate.  

Lawn signs do provide a least expensive form of advertising for candidates. Under the old law, the posting of a deposit has worked well to ensure that all signs are retrieved within days after the election. However, limiting the signs to only private property under the new law may also significantly limit awareness by voters of pending elections and names of candidates – especially for school board and budget elections. 

While reasonable limits on posting of signs may be a good idea, it also raises issues of freedom of speech and whether or not the town has the right to limit which signs and how many you may place on your private property. As written, there is no provision within the new sign law for expressing a political opinion or other forms of protest protected by free speech.

What if you wanted to place a "Stop the War" sign or a "Go Giants" sign or a quote from the Bible on your front lawn? Should the town government be able to require you to apply for a permit, charge you a fee and place a time limit on how long you can place the sign in your own yard? 

Under the new sign law, garage sale signs are exempt from requiring a permit but limited to the owner's yard and for period not exceeding seven days. Garage sale signs have been a source of litter because people never removed their signs after the sale. The old law prohibited signs from being posted on utility poles but was never enforced by the town.

The new law allows for temporary home "for sale" or "for rent" signs, but these must be removed within three days of the sale or rental. Real estate open house signs can remain only for the day of the open house with longer periods of time requiring a permit. No permit is required for contractor signs on premises where construction, renovation or repair is in progress.

Under the new law, non-profits, religious organizations and charities are exempt from the requirement for a permit or fee but not from the regulations of the law. Under the new law, any signs for charitable fundraisers and community events are also prohibited from being posted on town property and rights of ways. This will prevent community fundraisers and church bazaars from publicizing their events on a sign along public streets – a very effective and least expensive form of advertising a charitable or non-profit community event.

While SPACE understands the town's good intentions behind adoption of the amended Town of Stony Point Sign Law (Article IX), we are very concerned that some provisions within the new sign law are excessive, unnecessary and not well considered. It may limit voter awareness and participation in local elections, could limit fundraising ability for charities and non-profits and could lead to unequal enforcement  of the law – unfairly singling out signs of political opponents or of unpopular opinions, while selectively turning a blind eye to others more favorable. We expect our elected officials to not only read the law but understand its consequences. 

By attempting to regulate non-commercial, temporary signs and "political speech" based on content they are clearly violating citizen freedoms protected by the First Amendment of the United Sates Constitution, which they have taken an oath to uphold.

George Potanovic, Jr.
President, SPACE
Stony Point Action Committee for the Environment 

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from New City Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Kathleen May 21, 2013 at 08:55 am
CANDLE Night at the Rockland Boulders Game Join CANDLE for a fun(d)raising game on May 23rd as theRead More Rockland Boulders take on the Trois-Rivieres Aigles. Proceeds from tickets purchased through CANDLE* will support programs that educate & empower youth and reduce substance abuse and violence in Rockland County and beyond.
Heywood Jablohme May 21, 2013 at 02:48 pm
I agree with most of your points, but surely you are not implying that teachers are expected toRead More produce funding to correct school roofs, right? I think you got a bit off topic here, but I agree that our educational infrastructure is in disrepair and is in desperate need of rehabilitation. Maybe if our teacher's unions allowed a little more leeway we could allocate funding a little more appropriately and fund the important things instead of overpaying paying dinosaur teachers who lost interest a long time ago and fight any and all forms of teacher benchmarking.
WGMom May 20, 2013 at 09:10 am
It's entirely true that every professional has out-of-pocket expenses. But as someone who worked asRead More a corporate trainer, I can guarantee you I NEVER had to pay out of pocket expenses for supplies to teach classes. Every piece of paper, supply, and even snacks for the participants were fully covered expenses. If I had to spend out of pocket money to procure supplies, I could submit for a reimbursement, and receive it, no questions asked. I am now in school to become a high school teacher and I can see the stark difference in how the education of folks in a corporate environment is incredibly different, and privileged, than the public school environment. I've sat through numerous classes in the Clarkstown and Ramapo districts, doing observations required for my education certification, and while Clarkstown certainly benefits from certain advantages, the shabbiness of being a public school is still there. Furniture, such as teacher desks, that looks like it was purchased in a garage sale 30 years ago... faculty bathrooms that are dark and dingy, nearly crumbling, and sorely in need of updating. Etc. The public expects teachers to have professional training, act professionally, but they lack sometimes basic resources and are expected to function in an environment that feels more like a dungeon than an institution of learning. The citizens of Clarkstown, if they could get a tour of some of the facilities they are expecting children to learn in, and teachers to teach in, would be very surprised. We do supply some great technology, but then we put it in classrooms with windows that won't stay closed when it's windy, as one example. I spent most of my time in South, which is the best of the bunch, facilities-wise. Clarkstown North is a mess, Woodglen's woods are littered with fallen trees no one's cleaned up after Sandy, Laurel Plains had to be shuttered thanks to that whole foul stench... the district is in a situation where there are major capital improvements that are going to be needed. Buildings are aging, and it seems it's only the most basic of upkeep that happens. The district can't even fix the roofs of the buildings without applying for a state grant.
Heywood Jablohme May 18, 2013 at 07:17 am
What professional doesn't spend $500 per year on out of pocket expenses related to their jobs?Read More Staples offering 10% (or 5 in some cases) is hardly an example of the community getting involved. Thankfully, there are other examples of the community and PTA's getting involved and providing needed services. Clarkstown and surrounding areas hardly have substantial unmet needs in their classroom, thankfully.
Truth4all May 16, 2013 at 11:37 am
I guess better late than never. LaCorte is serving his 4th year as Mayor and was Trustee for I thinkRead More 4 years before that. This year is the only time he has brought the idea to the village about participating in this program. He is motivated by the opportunity of getting positive press for his County Executive campaign. The village should have been involved in this program ( as well as the Americorps program) long before this. On a positive note, hopefully the Village will continue this worthwhile partnership for many years to come.