.
Feedback

UPDATE: 6 Teens from New City, Congers Arrested After Brawl At Lake Nanuet

Police: Bats and a knife used in fight; four youths from Nanuet and Pearl River injured. Fight involved Clarkstown North and Nanuet high school students.

A large fight involving bats and knife at Lake Nanuet led to four youths from Pearl River and Nanuet being injured and six youths from New City and Congers being arrested, according to Clarkstown police.

The incident Saturday night at the park in Nanuet involved around 30 male high school and college students. Those arrested and injured were either 17 or 18 years old. Students from Clarkstown North and Nanuet high school were involved. 

Charges against the six arrested include Attempted Gang Assault, Assault and Criminal Possession of a Weapon. Police recovered baseball bats and knives at the scene.  Four youths with from cuts, bruises and possible concussions were taken to Nyack Hospital where they were treated and released. 

Police report when they arrived at Lake Nanuet at 10:05 p.m. on Saturday, Jan. 12 they found the four injured male youths - one 18 year old and two 17-year-olds from Pearl River and one 17 year old from Nanuet. Police are not releasing names of the victims for safety reasons.

The Detective Bureau determined the fight involved a group of about 15 students from one of the high schools arbitrarily attacking five or six students from the other high school.  They report several assailants, some allegedly using baseball bats as weapons, overpowered each of the victims. 

The six arrested teens had various charges lodged against them.

One 17 year old from Congers and one 17 year old and one 18 year old both from New City were charged with Attempted Gang Assault 1st degree, a felony, Assault 2nd degree, a felony, and Assault 3rd degree, a misdemeanor.  One 17 year old and one 18 year old both from Congers were charged with Assault 2nd degree and Assault 3rd degree. A 17 year old from New City was charged with Criminal Possession of a Weapon 4th degree, a misdemeanor.    

The six are eligible for youthful offender status and were arraignedand released to their parents pending a court date of January 30th in Clarkstown Justice Court.  Police report they expect to make additional arrests. 

someonesmom January 22, 2013 at 11:39 am
Regardless of what your little darling heard, she had her information incorrect too. But thanks for pointing out that she's such a stand up person, honor student and all, that she spoke up when the rumors crossed her ears.
Marie January 22, 2013 at 12:23 pm
Armed Forces has similar information as what I have heard. A fight was to happen with younger children and never did, the rumor mill started with Nanuet having bats. When the rumors hit the older students showed up to Nanuet and attacked kids who were just hanging out. The so called fight was already over so the children hanging out were doing just that hanging out when they were attacked. Also kids do stupid things we all know that, however this generation is so informed about bullying and violence that swinging a bat across someones face is a serious act. Some of these YOUNG ADULTS really should know better. How do you justify this act as protecton when you are the one out of your area entering another area with bats and attacking unarmed students? If you really believe that there was a fight planned, then why was Clarkstown the ones out of there area and the ones armed with bats? And why wasn't there more Nanuet students there at 10pm? From what I have heard the fight was to happen earlier and didn't because the one boy bailed out. So at 10pm there was no fight planned according to the Nanuet students only a fight planned by Clarkstown. It worries me that any parent would be accepting to hitting another child who is unarmed with a bat. I'm thankful that these students were not seriously hurt, however this really could have been much worse and that is what needs to be addressed. Not the fact that the children at Nanuet where there for a fight.
Cookie January 22, 2013 at 01:36 pm
Armed forces: You wrote that the cowardly Clarkstown kids waited until 100 teens dispersed before attacking remaining few? Why were 100 nanuet kids there hanging out? 100? Think maybe they knew there was chance of fight? Clarkstown arrested six kids - not 30. That number ins inflated. What would have happened if Clarkstown teens were met by 100 nanuet kids? Think about that. They knew.....
Cookie January 22, 2013 at 01:47 pm
Many comments have been deleted- so much for freedom of speech. The victims of this were innocently hanging out at lake nanuet partaking in underage drinking and possibly smoking pot cause there is no where else to go. Mrs. Magoo says the police monitor activities at Lake. So are,you saying they turn a blind eye to your kids illegal activities? So far kids could have been arrested for underage drinking, possession of pot, and trespassing. But now they are teens in the wrong place at wrong time because this weekend they were attacked? Who drives home after drinking? Think about that before you cast a stone at Clarkstown parents. You allow your child to be there. You condone his choice to break the law. Just because you think drinking age should be 18 - it isn't.
Cookie January 22, 2013 at 01:50 pm
Car pulled over wasn't a Clarkstown student either
Cookie January 22, 2013 at 01:57 pm
Thirty kids were not involved is what I am saying about number inflated. To date, six arrests.
Mr Magoo January 22, 2013 at 02:17 pm
Chestnut, My son was also jumped that night at the lake. Since you have information related to the case instead of blogging please call Detective Cole Hatcher, Clarkstown Detective. My lawyer is preparing to file a civil lawsuit and I want to make sure he has all the correct facts.
Nurse January 22, 2013 at 02:23 pm
All children should pay that we're involved in this brutal atrack. They should have their names listed in the paper like every other criminal does and they should be punished to the fullest extent if the law.
Chestnut January 22, 2013 at 03:36 pm
Please don't make this a personal attack Mrs. Magoo. I have not attacked you or anyone else. I am trying to bring facts as I know them to the conversation. These situations are less than clear and a healthy exchange of information is a good idea.
I understand you are emotional and you have every right in the world to be upset. If my kid was beaten with a bat I would be too. I am upset this happened in our little town which I always thought was a safe place. Apparently not? The kids using weapons should go to jail. period.
Chestnut January 22, 2013 at 03:39 pm
I am happy to call Detective Hatcher. Thank you for making the suggestion.
Paulette Renard January 22, 2013 at 03:59 pm
One problem is that our police are overpaid and so their numbers are going down. If their costs had been better controlled by the gromack administration we could have had more police available to monitor these gatherings and deal with them. The Clarkstown police force is one of the highest paid in the United States. The Journal News in October 2012 said that the average pay of the police is just under $180000 and adding in pension and healthcare the average compensation is just over $250000. Its Chief, Michael Sullivan, make more than the Chief of Police in New York City and Sullivan only oversees a force of less than 170 officers. The police will earn in salary raises about another 13 percent over the next five years. Four of the officers when you combine their individual salaries earn over one million dollars per year before benefits. Because of these insane costs and future pension costs the number of police we have in Clarkstown will have to go down. You might want to start here to understand the problem.
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/05/03/nyregion/03clarkstown.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0
someonesmom January 22, 2013 at 09:48 pm
@ Back on land
You sir, are sadly misinformed. The truth will come out. Money or no money. And the News 12 segment had an interview with the lead detective! Are you saying he got it wrong?
someonesmom January 22, 2013 at 09:59 pm
Make it seven. AND just because there have been only 7 arrests so far, doesn't mean there weren't more people there. Seriously?
so as per your statement which I am sure is very accurate..then in clarkstown north and as well as south w emay just have 2 dare officers at an qverage salarie of 180,000 now that is scary..and one has to ponder why didnt the north dare officer hear or see anything in the week before the"gang fight"???? see having expensive people doesnt guarantee anything!!! what if they had guns that night?? wow clarkstown would have been famous!!!!!!!!!!so sad so clowntown..nothing ever cganhes iin this big top of a pindot on the map...except more raises for everyone..THATS IT RAISE THE HOMEOWNERS TAXES!!!!!!!!FORCE MORE TO MOVE!!!!MAYBE THE BOARDWALL IN CONGERITEVILLE WILL LAST LONGER WITH NO ONE USING IT!!!
Marianne Reilly January 24, 2013 at 06:07 pm
I deleted many of my own posts as there seems to be very few posters with the intelligence to hear what really happened. Many of these posts are angry, small minded, finger pointing, self important and mean. Like the one above from Cookie. Just shaking my head in disgust. As they say you can't make this stuff up.
I hope this post gets published.
Cookie January 25, 2013 at 02:24 pm
Mrs. Magoo: I am not small minded or finger pointing. I am intelligent enough to know you are a mother trying to let everyone know you child was jumped, beat, etc and had no knowledge of this prior. I understand. I am simply repeating your own comments that the nanuet kids hang out at lake to drink and that you think drinking age should be 18. When I said the amount of kids involved was not 30. 7 arrests to date. I certainly do not condone the behavior that occurred and I am sorry your boy was hurt. I was only answering previous posts. You want us all to know that it was not a per arranged fight and the nanuet boys were not expecting Clarkstown boys. No one disputed what you believe they are posting what they believe. That's what a blog is. Hope your son gets well. I am upset by the 3 on 1 . Boys fighting is nothing new. Jumping and weapons changes it up. Not parents fault that kids made poor decisions that evening. Unfortunately, I truly do not think the kids will be charged. So u go after parents to pay for kids that screw up.
Cookie January 25, 2013 at 02:28 pm
They will be charged- I meant to say they will walk away. It's the system . Not the parents fault.
Suzanne Vondracek Panaro January 25, 2013 at 09:09 pm
The names of the arrested were released today on lohud.com for all those interested.
And Cookie, I have first hand knowledge of the incident as well, plus there were at least 10 females there that were witnesses. Yes, "the lake" is where those kids hang out. If they are drinking or smoking or just simply hanging out after dark where they shouldn't be, issue them a summons -- but they surely don't deserve to be bashed in the head with bats! The Nanuet boys WERE NOT expecting this.....and the accused WILL NOT walk away. And now that the names of the arrested have been released....why aren't any of them Nanuet/Pearl River kids if it was a "planned" fight?
Cookie January 25, 2013 at 11:03 pm
Can't helping; where did I say that the nanuet boys deserved to be beat for hanging out? Pay attention. I was again repeating mrs. Maggo mantra that the kids have no where to hang out so they drink in the dark at the lake. Another parent said earlier in the evening over 100 kids were at lake enforce north boys arrived. I commented that why were 100 kids there in jan if they were not expecting trouble. I know only the Clarkstown boys were charged in assault and I have commented how wrong to attack with weapons and 3 on 1. They will walk. All but two.
Cookie January 25, 2013 at 11:05 pm
Before north boys arrived.
Suzanne Vondracek Panaro January 26, 2013 at 01:26 am
Ya know Cookie, it's one thing to have your opinion, but to speak as if you have facts and quote others who "think" they know what happened is just silly. First of all, there were not 100 boys there -- EVER. And second, what makes you so sure everyone will walk "except two"? Are you one of their lawyers or something?
Marianne Reilly January 26, 2013 at 02:07 am
Cookie who said anything about the Clarkstown parents. YOU! You have accused the Nanuet boys of many things that they have not been in trouble for. I never said the kids hang out at Nanuet Lake to drink. I said If the 18 year old Clarkstown boys could be in a bar socializing etc.. they wouldn't care about the younger Nanuet kids and revenge for something that didn't happen I wish you would not twist what I meant. I said I feel for the parents especially the parents of the brothers. Who knows where this is going I don't so how do you? And many people thought this was planned and the Nanuet kids knew. You jinxing the Clarkstown parents with your comments. Maybe you should give it a rest.
Robin Traum (Editor) January 26, 2013 at 02:34 am
Please do not make personal attacks on others in the comments. You can state your opinion without insulting others.
Cookie January 26, 2013 at 05:23 am
Ok last comment. I did repeat what you said mrs. Magoo. You deleted some of your posts. I am not their lawyer. I am a parent that sympathies with both sets of parents - the victims and the Clarkstown boys. I would never jinx them. My remarks about they will walk all but two is my opinion. Based on previous similar cases. Also 4 or 5 of those boys are first time offenders and have never been in trouble. The other few had trouble before. I will say it again, I am very sorry for the nanuet boys. It wasn't a fight. It was an attack. Several people on blog blamed the parents. I was Defending the parents. Jeez. Good luck. Hope u get justice. I'm going let it rest
Marianne Reilly January 26, 2013 at 03:08 pm
Best defense is a good offense? Seems to me your mantra is to say anything to put Nanuet boys in a bad light to make the Clarkstown boys look justified in their actions? Weather they walk or not is a decision the Courts will determine.
Marianne Reilly January 26, 2013 at 03:36 pm
@can'thelpit Exactly there were no Nanuet/Pearl River kids arrested because they didn't do anything. There was no fight earlier there were never 100 kids at "the Lake"
Yes there was a rumor that earlier in the afternoon that the younger kids from Nanuet and Clarkstown may fight, but that didn't happen. One of the Clarkstown boys said his brother was beat up this was untrue as the police said the brother was fine and off skiing/snowboarding for the day. The girls were smart, called the police and wrote down the plates of the cars at the Lake. Wonder where the Clarkstown boys hang out on the weekend. Their equivalent of the Nanuet Lake I imagine.
Marianne Reilly January 26, 2013 at 05:45 pm
Where do the kids get the money for BMW's and Escalades? Not exactly blaming the parents but kids having bats and carrying knives in their cars? YIKES! If thats the culture of those particular kids maybe the parents should searching their cars and removing weapons and other inappropriate stuff. All parents should be checking cars, their kids rooms, facebooks and twitters. Take a look at who they hang out with and know or have an idea about their friends family life. It's good to pick up the phone and connect with your teens friends parents. It's not easy being a parent you can't say my kid is an honor student she/he would Never do this or that... On any given day anything can happen. Good kids make bad decisions all the time. It's good to be one step ahead of them if you can. They hate it and hate you but they know they are loved and cared about. The worst is parent peer pressure to let the kids drink, stay out late, and go places they are to young to go to. I dread Homecoming and Prom season for that reason. So high are the expectations, parents setting their kids up to drink, renting party busses etc... It's ridiculous and dangerous. I don't have the answers but if parents stuck together live would be easier for all. Parenting is not for sissies. Sometimes "no" is the only answer.
Marianne Reilly January 30, 2013 at 01:07 pm
Defending the parents by accusing the Nanuet boys of Drinking, smoking pot and drunk driving?
Cookie you said The victims of this were innocently hanging out at lake nanuet partaking in underage drinking and possibly smoking pot cause there is no where else to go. Mrs. Magoo says the police monitor activities at Lake. So are,you saying they turn a blind eye to your kids illegal activities? So far kids could have been arrested for underage drinking, possession of pot, and trespassing. But now they are teens in the wrong place at wrong time because this weekend they were attacked? Who drives home after drinking?" You call that defending the Clarkstown parents? Then you blamed the Nanuet parents. I understand you must have a very close relationship with these famliies but you are not helping them by attacking others.
Mr.G February 12, 2013 at 06:52 pm
The rumor about the brother was true, there was an altercation the day before between nanuet and festa as well.
kev April 29, 2013 at 04:07 pm
None of you guys know what happened. You all act as if you know what happened just because you read or see it in the news. Not one of you guys have the story right or even came close to knowing what happened. There was not 15 north kids on six nanuet kids. there was about 30 upperclassmen from nanuet there but most of them ran off when the cops got there because most of them all were carrying pot and alcohol and the north kids just didnt go there for no reason. they went there because they all heard that one of the kids younger north kids were jumped in a fight that almost happened earlier that day so please get your facts straight because you guys dont know what actually happened.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from New City Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Jimmy R June 14, 2013 at 05:10 pm
The first thing little Frankie wanted to know was that since he was mayor of Suffern for the day,Read More could he get his bicycle fixed at the village Department of Public Works.
Paul Williams June 16, 2013 at 08:33 am
He also wanted to know the most effective method of spying on the other kids so he could get electedRead More Class President.
Green Farmer June 13, 2013 at 01:39 pm
Why not cut out the middle man and just send the money directly to the religious schools.
Paul Williams June 16, 2013 at 08:27 am
If they reported all their income........if every other home was not owned by a "RABBI"Read More and tax free.....if they returned all the books and learning materials they "borrowed" .......ETC ETC.....Get real Weeder.
Green Farmer June 13, 2013 at 01:42 pm
It will never happen.
M. Leybra June 16, 2013 at 07:25 pm
Shouldn't be happening in the first place & "requiring" another law to stop rippingRead More off Joe Blow taxpayer for county government elite, disgusting.
Champs pose for a picture (photo by Craig Fetterman)
Kevin Zawacki (Editor) June 12, 2013 at 11:03 am
Congratulations to the Cubs!
Scott F. June 12, 2013 at 11:35 am
The boys were awesome last night and all season long, a well deserved Championship for a great groupRead More of boys
Lisa Buchman (Editor) June 13, 2013 at 11:20 am
Fantastic! Just posted the photo on New City Facebook too!
Aerial of United Water's proposed water treatment plant
Tom Nimick June 11, 2013 at 09:23 pm
Mr. Pointing says that an issues conference is unusual. The unusual step is called for because thisRead More project is highly unusual; it is unprecedented. This French-owned water company wants to implement its pet technology at our expense - it makes sense for the company because the project makes lots of money. There is information available that calls into question the "definitive" studies carried out by the water company. Of course they found that their technology was the best option - what a surprise! They have not made the case that they carried out a disinterested examination of the issues in the public interest. Yes there are still issues. Also, stop threatening us with increased costs from delay. First, it does not make sense and second, you are trying to bully us into accepting your proposal. That is one more sign that something is wrong in your proposal.
John Taggart June 13, 2013 at 08:08 am
An issues conference will be a wast of time and money. So many ' issues ' have been pulled out ofRead More thin air. The people who organized against the plant will just keep saying the same thing. No amount of info will be enough, no answer will be accepted. The issues conference will be a circus of endless questions, ideas, and demands. Haverstraw bay reclassified as drinking water will better protect it, provide an endless supply of water and finally help end the stereotype of the Hudson being polluted Recommend
mike sullivan June 11, 2013 at 08:14 pm
get a life
Tom Nimick June 11, 2013 at 09:12 pm
There were no open meetings. I attended the April meeting and Mr. Lettre was directed by the TownRead More Board to return with more precise estimates and to include options for other upgrades. I have attended every meeting of the Town Board since that time and Mr. Lettre never returned in an open meeting. Mr. Borelli indicated that Mr. Lettre had addressed his concerns directly and privately. According to the Open Meetings Law, the deliberations of the Town Board are to be open and visible to the public. Private individual meetings or communications with members of the Town Board so as to avoid open deliberations flouts the intent of the Open Meetings Law. Mr. Gromack's statement of other meetings is inaccurate and, since it was specifically in response to a question about open meetings, dishonest. Mr. Borelli, shame on you for accepting a private communication and not standing by your guidance to Mr. Lettre that he was to come back to an open meeting of the Town Board.
Watchdog June 17, 2013 at 04:27 pm
Borelli and Ho -Man are in the bag for Lettre. They are not Republicans...just political hacks forRead More Lettre. RINOS.
galledeb June 10, 2013 at 10:45 am
How can I get more information? When and where are auditions?
Maddie June 10, 2013 at 04:25 pm
You can contact Pastor Robin at rdemaggio@ramapocentral.org
Tracy Urvater June 13, 2013 at 09:25 am
What are the dates of this camp?
Cicadas emerging from their 17 year slumber.
Kevin Zawacki (Editor) June 9, 2013 at 09:32 pm
Thanks for sharing, Grace! Your thoughts on their noise?
Grace Anthony Zemsky June 10, 2013 at 09:00 am
The traffic from the nearby Palisades Parkway is more of a noise nuisance than the cicada chorus.Read More (We have triple-paned windows because of it.) There is something almost musical about the hum of the cicadas. Of course, it may bother me more if I lived in the "affected area" and heard it constantly. Upon entering this nearby neighborhood, the sound crescendos. And yet, it can't be heard a couple of streets away. The drone of locusts is more bothersome than these 17 year cicadas.
Coleen Crowe June 10, 2013 at 01:30 pm
There are swarms of them at my house in upper nyack. Take a ride down Broadway in Upper Nyack nearRead More Nyack beach and they are super loud.
Linda June 8, 2013 at 10:39 am
I missed this! Is there still a way to get a signed copy? Maybe he will do another signing?
John Murphy June 11, 2013 at 08:20 am
This is the most accurate word picture of one of the tragic corollary side effects of one ofRead More humanities ' gruesome failings , which is war. Thank you Pam Sitomer for putting your writing genius to work for a noble cause.