.
Feedback

Revised 2012 County Spending Plan Delivered to Vanderhoef

County Executive has until end of business Wednesday, Dec. 14 to act

 

The 2012 proposed budget, which the Rockland County Legislature approved by a 12 to 4 vote on Tuesday night, was delivered to County Executive C. Scott Vanderhoef early this afternoon.  He has five days to act upon it.  The Clerk to the Legislature Laurence O’Toole had to certify that votes were taken on the 22 resolutions and two local laws before the budgetary documents could be forwarded. 

“We gave it to him today,” said Legislative Counsel Ricardo McKay. “The first day you count is tomorrow.”

By law, the had to adopt a budget by today, Dec. 7.  Vanderhoef has until the end of business on Wednesday, Dec. 14 to take one of several actions. He can veto the entire budget, which includes a 30 percent property tax increase, 3/8 of a percent sales tax hike and 40 job cuts.  Vanderhoef can veto certain line items and approve others or he can do nothing, which would result in the revised budget being implemented. 

McKay said if the county executive returns a “negative statement” to the legislature either a veto of the entire budget or specific line items, the legislature must meet again.

“We have no later than Dec. 20 to have another meeting of the full legislature,” he said. 

Under that scenario, legislators would have to vote on an override of any veto. The next full legislative meeting is slated for Monday, Dec. 19 at 7 p.m.

Maureen December 7, 2011 at 09:07 pm
Be a MAN, Scott, and stick to your principles and your budget! Either veto this or retire and let someone else get us out of this tax and spend mess. Watch the comments that will follow mine and you will have no doubt what you, as OUR servant, are expected to do. Let the Legislature vote to override your veto if it dares and we will take care of each one of its members at the polls.
Who else would like to support/oppose this comment?
Thomas Leonard December 7, 2011 at 09:31 pm
I agree a veto is needed.
Walt December 7, 2011 at 09:44 pm
Veto it, serious cuts need to be made.
dennis December 7, 2011 at 09:57 pm
Veto the budget. Looks like an interesting election next time around. 30% increase what are they smoking.
linda Paolino December 7, 2011 at 10:50 pm
Veto. A 30% property tax increase is going to be a hardship for many families in Rockland County.
George C December 7, 2011 at 11:33 pm
I say borrow 800 million. Then we can give all employees a nice raise. Hire more people. Give out more "free stuff". With 800 million, we could give a tax rebate to everyone. We could eliminate the sales tax, the mta tax, the mortgage tax. It would be great!
We are kicking the can down the road with borrowing, so instead of having to borrow more each year, lets just borrow what we really need and have some extra too. After all, it's free money right? We never have to pay it back. It's the Obama way. Also Scott, while you are at it, I think we need to expand the department of tourism. After all, Rockland County has so many attractions that attract outsiders. Let's also hire more employees, since the people are overworked. Just think what more people can do working for the county. I also think that we should give all the legislators a nice raise, we should even give them longevity pay for all their great years of service and all of their help in getting us to where we are today. It's the least we can do as taxpayers. Borrow, borrow, borrow, but borrow enough so we have lots of extra money to spend. That will fix the mess we are in.
fred December 7, 2011 at 11:55 pm
we need gromack in for county exec.he will lead us down the golden road.hopefully a quickcheck to
David Simon December 8, 2011 at 02:19 am
Robin, you should cover what happens in the event that he does veto.
The recommendations he made close down Summit Park Hospital in Pomona, NY. If he vetos he will kill hundreds of government jobs. These- mostly born in Rockland, have spent their lives working in that hospital. By privatizing it you cut benefits that were promised to people significantly and take opportunity out of Rocklands present.
DMM13 December 8, 2011 at 02:11 pm
I am not happy with the proposed hike either but I believe it comes down out to approx 160.000 a year on the avg. I can live with that to right the ship and save those jobs...but we do need to make cuts for the future. Some areas as law enforcement isnt an option...caps is probablly the way in that area of the budget.
I am sure we can make some cuts and solid decisions and save money with out hurting the quality of life here in rockland....first cut should be the elimination of the tourism dept.....we all know what thats about
Walt December 8, 2011 at 03:17 pm
Make the hard decision NOW! Every year we hear "it will only $20 per household increase" but my increase is always into the hundreds of $ and I have the same size home as everyone in the neighborhood.
Using RC taxpayer money for jobs that aren't productive, are redundant and have have no accountability for the sake of keeping them is foolish. If Summit Park can be privatized, than do it. Eliminate the tourism department. Eliminate the RC Dept of Transportation because using tax $ to subsidize a bus company to run half empty busses all over the County at all hours is a waste. If there is money to be made running busses, then let a private company foot the bill but using tax money to keep TOR afloat is ridiculous.
linda Paolino December 8, 2011 at 03:20 pm
I don't. What is that about?
JP December 8, 2011 at 06:01 pm
Veto this Budget! It wil be just too costly down the road. The days of wine and roses are over. Just look to Gov. Cuomo and Gov. Christie if you want to see what reform looks like. Sometimes it hurts but you've got to make some substantial cuts somewhere.
Tony B December 8, 2011 at 06:13 pm
Let's not kill the masses to save a few hundred. Hopefully they saved their pennies over the years they enjoyed. Scott needs to grow a pair and do what's right. Otherwise he' s out next round. Everone's on the same page on this. It should be clear. Veto! Start trimming.
kathy morrissette December 8, 2011 at 07:15 pm
how much more money will the average homeowner be asked to pay--in dollars?
Mike Hirsch February 29, 2012 at 10:07 pm
Great idea George, but why stop at 800 million? Let's borrow 800 billion. That way our representatives could send us all a check for several hundred thousand. We can then all abandon our homes and leave this sorry state.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from New City Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Jimmy R June 14, 2013 at 05:10 pm
The first thing little Frankie wanted to know was that since he was mayor of Suffern for the day,Read More could he get his bicycle fixed at the village Department of Public Works.
Paul Williams June 16, 2013 at 08:33 am
He also wanted to know the most effective method of spying on the other kids so he could get electedRead More Class President.
Green Farmer June 13, 2013 at 01:39 pm
Why not cut out the middle man and just send the money directly to the religious schools.
Paul Williams June 16, 2013 at 08:27 am
If they reported all their income........if every other home was not owned by a "RABBI"Read More and tax free.....if they returned all the books and learning materials they "borrowed" .......ETC ETC.....Get real Weeder.
Green Farmer June 13, 2013 at 01:42 pm
It will never happen.
M. Leybra June 16, 2013 at 07:25 pm
Shouldn't be happening in the first place & "requiring" another law to stop rippingRead More off Joe Blow taxpayer for county government elite, disgusting.
Champs pose for a picture (photo by Craig Fetterman)
Kevin Zawacki (Editor) June 12, 2013 at 11:03 am
Congratulations to the Cubs!
Scott F. June 12, 2013 at 11:35 am
The boys were awesome last night and all season long, a well deserved Championship for a great groupRead More of boys
Lisa Buchman (Editor) June 13, 2013 at 11:20 am
Fantastic! Just posted the photo on New City Facebook too!
Aerial of United Water's proposed water treatment plant
Tom Nimick June 11, 2013 at 09:23 pm
Mr. Pointing says that an issues conference is unusual. The unusual step is called for because thisRead More project is highly unusual; it is unprecedented. This French-owned water company wants to implement its pet technology at our expense - it makes sense for the company because the project makes lots of money. There is information available that calls into question the "definitive" studies carried out by the water company. Of course they found that their technology was the best option - what a surprise! They have not made the case that they carried out a disinterested examination of the issues in the public interest. Yes there are still issues. Also, stop threatening us with increased costs from delay. First, it does not make sense and second, you are trying to bully us into accepting your proposal. That is one more sign that something is wrong in your proposal.
John Taggart June 13, 2013 at 08:08 am
An issues conference will be a wast of time and money. So many ' issues ' have been pulled out ofRead More thin air. The people who organized against the plant will just keep saying the same thing. No amount of info will be enough, no answer will be accepted. The issues conference will be a circus of endless questions, ideas, and demands. Haverstraw bay reclassified as drinking water will better protect it, provide an endless supply of water and finally help end the stereotype of the Hudson being polluted Recommend
mike sullivan June 11, 2013 at 08:14 pm
get a life
Tom Nimick June 11, 2013 at 09:12 pm
There were no open meetings. I attended the April meeting and Mr. Lettre was directed by the TownRead More Board to return with more precise estimates and to include options for other upgrades. I have attended every meeting of the Town Board since that time and Mr. Lettre never returned in an open meeting. Mr. Borelli indicated that Mr. Lettre had addressed his concerns directly and privately. According to the Open Meetings Law, the deliberations of the Town Board are to be open and visible to the public. Private individual meetings or communications with members of the Town Board so as to avoid open deliberations flouts the intent of the Open Meetings Law. Mr. Gromack's statement of other meetings is inaccurate and, since it was specifically in response to a question about open meetings, dishonest. Mr. Borelli, shame on you for accepting a private communication and not standing by your guidance to Mr. Lettre that he was to come back to an open meeting of the Town Board.
Watchdog June 17, 2013 at 04:27 pm
Borelli and Ho -Man are in the bag for Lettre. They are not Republicans...just political hacks forRead More Lettre. RINOS.
galledeb June 10, 2013 at 10:45 am
How can I get more information? When and where are auditions?
Maddie June 10, 2013 at 04:25 pm
You can contact Pastor Robin at rdemaggio@ramapocentral.org
Tracy Urvater June 13, 2013 at 09:25 am
What are the dates of this camp?
Cicadas emerging from their 17 year slumber.
Kevin Zawacki (Editor) June 9, 2013 at 09:32 pm
Thanks for sharing, Grace! Your thoughts on their noise?
Grace Anthony Zemsky June 10, 2013 at 09:00 am
The traffic from the nearby Palisades Parkway is more of a noise nuisance than the cicada chorus.Read More (We have triple-paned windows because of it.) There is something almost musical about the hum of the cicadas. Of course, it may bother me more if I lived in the "affected area" and heard it constantly. Upon entering this nearby neighborhood, the sound crescendos. And yet, it can't be heard a couple of streets away. The drone of locusts is more bothersome than these 17 year cicadas.
Coleen Crowe June 10, 2013 at 01:30 pm
There are swarms of them at my house in upper nyack. Take a ride down Broadway in Upper Nyack nearRead More Nyack beach and they are super loud.
Linda June 8, 2013 at 10:39 am
I missed this! Is there still a way to get a signed copy? Maybe he will do another signing?
John Murphy June 11, 2013 at 08:20 am
This is the most accurate word picture of one of the tragic corollary side effects of one ofRead More humanities ' gruesome failings , which is war. Thank you Pam Sitomer for putting your writing genius to work for a noble cause.