.
Feedback

State Assembly Coalition Opposed to “New Jersey First Act”

Lawmakers object to New Jersey instituting a residency requirement for state employees

 

Assemblyman Kenneth Zebrowski (D-New City) and 25 Assembly colleagues sent a letter to Governor Chris Christie expressing their strong opposition to the New Jersey First Act and asking him to repeal it. The New Jersey First Act is the first statewide residency requirement that applies to all public employees.

“The NJ First Act is a discriminatory policy that puts New Yorkers at an economic disadvantage when seeking employment,” said Zebrowski. “It is beneficial to both states to have open borders in respect to all employment opportunities.”

The NJ First Act has already been law for nine months. It became effective on September 1, 2011 and requires all state and local government employees to reside in the State of New Jersey. All employees who were employed on or before September 1, 2011 are grandfathered in. However, if an employee changes positions he or she could be in danger of losing that grandfathered status. This law will place a statewide requirement on all public employment including teachers, administrators and all other government positions.

“This bill sets a dangerous precedent by impeding the flow of human capital between New York and New Jersey,” said Zebrowski. “Many New Yorkers who live only a few miles from a prospective New Jersey employer are denied employment based on where they call home; not on their qualifications for the job.”

The bipartisan letter sent on May 29 stated the signers’ strong opposition to the law and requested that Governor Christie seek to repeal it. The signers also stated that inaction by the governor would result in New York seeking a similar residency requirement to protect its constituencies, which is already underway. Assemblyman Zebrowski has already introduced a bill to institute a residency requirement (A.10618).

“This unprecedented law will have a negative impact on the regional economy and will force surrounding states to pursue similar public employment restrictions in order to level the playing field for our residents,” stated Zebrowski. “Our letter makes it very clear; open the borders for employment or we will push our own residency requirement.”

The State of New Jersey Civil Service Commission provides the following information on its website. 

The “New Jersey First Act,” , N.J.S.A. 52:14-7 (L. 2011, Chapter 70)  effective September 1, 2011, contains new residency requirements for public officers and employees, unless exempted under the law. Current, new or prospective employees should be aware of the following:

Effective September  1, 2011, all employees of State and local government must reside in the State of New Jersey, unless exempted under the law.  If you already work for State or local government as of September  1,  2011, and you do not live in New Jersey, you are not required to move to New Jersey.  However, if you begin your office, position or employment on September  1,  2011 or later, you must reside in New Jersey.  If you do not reside in New Jersey, you have one year after the date you take your office, position or employment to relocate your residence to New Jersey.  If you do not do so, you are subject to removal from your office, position or employment. 

An application for exemption is also available on the website. 

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from New City Patch? Find your Local Patch »

John Taggart June 13, 2012 at 10:23 am
Go ahead and push our own residency requirement Zebrowski. Maybe its a good idea to have local taxes pay local workers and have local workers share the tax burden that pays them.
Without residency couldn't you have a person endorsing higher taxes in order to fund a raise in their pay and benifits, and not be effected by the tax increase they are pushing for ?
Sam June 13, 2012 at 11:25 am
So if they won't let us work there I say don't shop there. Lets see how happy Paramus is when New Yorkers stop going there to shop. I say boycott all New Jersey stores! Keep your dollars in New York.
Mike Hirsch June 13, 2012 at 12:07 pm
Chris Christie is a man after my own heart. I see nothing wrong with the State of New Jersey requiring public employees to reside in the state. New York should pass a similiar law. Maybe they can expand it to require anyone receiving a tax free NYS pension to reside in the state also.
F*** June 13, 2012 at 02:09 pm
Maybe Clarkstown shouldn't be hiring tax attorneys based in Yonkers.
Mary June 13, 2012 at 02:26 pm
It's none of New York's business what New Jersey is doing. Maybe NY should have thought about this first...but, they're too busy figuring out how to get more money out of wallets.
Tony T June 13, 2012 at 11:47 pm
Those hired by the County or Towns in Rockland should live or be required to live in the County orTown they work for.
Watchdog June 14, 2012 at 12:15 am
I am against this. I would like Vanderhoef an pnd most members of the Legislature to get jobs in Joisey
Watchdog June 14, 2012 at 12:19 am
HOW ABOUT NYS PUBLIC PENSIONERS PAYING NYS TAXES?
JoJo August 1, 2012 at 04:00 pm
Maybe if you are trying to keep more money in your state, you shouldn't be paying double pensions to people working for the state and local government. Isn't one pension enough .......let others have an opportunity to work.
JoJo August 1, 2012 at 04:04 pm
I also have the same issue is P.A. and working in Education in N,J please
go to change.org and join the Repeal NJ First Act Petition!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Fight for you right freedom to work for whomever wants to hire you where ever it may be.
JoJo August 1, 2012 at 04:07 pm
Last time I looked I see an American flag flying high in the sky. NY,NJ,PA,
This law is discrimination at its best, If it's all about tax monies than tax me so I can keep my job! A assemblyman Kenneth Zebrowaski and 25 others in New City NY wrote to Governor Christie:“The NJ First Act is a discriminatory policy that puts New Yorkers at an economic disadvantage when seeking employment,” said Zebrowski. “It is beneficial to both states to have open borders in respect to all employment opportunities.”
Jennifer Lechleiter August 15, 2012 at 01:32 am
Thank you, I just signed the petition. I wish more people were concerned about this and would push for the repeal. Personally, I would like the freedom of being able to live out of state (I am a NJ teacher). NJ may pay my salary but I will pay NJ income taz so why can I not choose where to spend my property tax. How is it any different than the government telling me "You can no longer shop out of state." or "You can't seek medical care out of state."? Perhaps if NJ wasn't so costly to live in I would not be looking elsewhere in the first place. I am a valued educator and I am proud to say that my school does not want to see me leave. Why must I, simply because I'd like more property and less property taxes just beyond state lines?
Dora Bowers September 1, 2012 at 09:00 pm
I'm on my way to sign the petition! Thank you for this site. It was hard to locate some sanity. We are all Americans and in this together. To add to the burden of employees (or the unemployed) at such a challenging economic period is outrageous!
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Jimmy R June 14, 2013 at 05:10 pm
The first thing little Frankie wanted to know was that since he was mayor of Suffern for the day,Read More could he get his bicycle fixed at the village Department of Public Works.
Paul Williams June 16, 2013 at 08:33 am
He also wanted to know the most effective method of spying on the other kids so he could get electedRead More Class President.
Green Farmer June 13, 2013 at 01:39 pm
Why not cut out the middle man and just send the money directly to the religious schools.
Paul Williams June 16, 2013 at 08:27 am
If they reported all their income........if every other home was not owned by a "RABBI"Read More and tax free.....if they returned all the books and learning materials they "borrowed" .......ETC ETC.....Get real Weeder.
Green Farmer June 13, 2013 at 01:42 pm
It will never happen.
M. Leybra June 16, 2013 at 07:25 pm
Shouldn't be happening in the first place & "requiring" another law to stop rippingRead More off Joe Blow taxpayer for county government elite, disgusting.
Champs pose for a picture (photo by Craig Fetterman)
Kevin Zawacki (Editor) June 12, 2013 at 11:03 am
Congratulations to the Cubs!
Scott F. June 12, 2013 at 11:35 am
The boys were awesome last night and all season long, a well deserved Championship for a great groupRead More of boys
Lisa Buchman (Editor) June 13, 2013 at 11:20 am
Fantastic! Just posted the photo on New City Facebook too!
Aerial of United Water's proposed water treatment plant
Tom Nimick June 11, 2013 at 09:23 pm
Mr. Pointing says that an issues conference is unusual. The unusual step is called for because thisRead More project is highly unusual; it is unprecedented. This French-owned water company wants to implement its pet technology at our expense - it makes sense for the company because the project makes lots of money. There is information available that calls into question the "definitive" studies carried out by the water company. Of course they found that their technology was the best option - what a surprise! They have not made the case that they carried out a disinterested examination of the issues in the public interest. Yes there are still issues. Also, stop threatening us with increased costs from delay. First, it does not make sense and second, you are trying to bully us into accepting your proposal. That is one more sign that something is wrong in your proposal.
John Taggart June 13, 2013 at 08:08 am
An issues conference will be a wast of time and money. So many ' issues ' have been pulled out ofRead More thin air. The people who organized against the plant will just keep saying the same thing. No amount of info will be enough, no answer will be accepted. The issues conference will be a circus of endless questions, ideas, and demands. Haverstraw bay reclassified as drinking water will better protect it, provide an endless supply of water and finally help end the stereotype of the Hudson being polluted Recommend
mike sullivan June 11, 2013 at 08:14 pm
get a life
Tom Nimick June 11, 2013 at 09:12 pm
There were no open meetings. I attended the April meeting and Mr. Lettre was directed by the TownRead More Board to return with more precise estimates and to include options for other upgrades. I have attended every meeting of the Town Board since that time and Mr. Lettre never returned in an open meeting. Mr. Borelli indicated that Mr. Lettre had addressed his concerns directly and privately. According to the Open Meetings Law, the deliberations of the Town Board are to be open and visible to the public. Private individual meetings or communications with members of the Town Board so as to avoid open deliberations flouts the intent of the Open Meetings Law. Mr. Gromack's statement of other meetings is inaccurate and, since it was specifically in response to a question about open meetings, dishonest. Mr. Borelli, shame on you for accepting a private communication and not standing by your guidance to Mr. Lettre that he was to come back to an open meeting of the Town Board.
Watchdog June 17, 2013 at 04:27 pm
Borelli and Ho -Man are in the bag for Lettre. They are not Republicans...just political hacks forRead More Lettre. RINOS.
galledeb June 10, 2013 at 10:45 am
How can I get more information? When and where are auditions?
Maddie June 10, 2013 at 04:25 pm
You can contact Pastor Robin at rdemaggio@ramapocentral.org
Tracy Urvater June 13, 2013 at 09:25 am
What are the dates of this camp?
Cicadas emerging from their 17 year slumber.
Kevin Zawacki (Editor) June 9, 2013 at 09:32 pm
Thanks for sharing, Grace! Your thoughts on their noise?
Grace Anthony Zemsky June 10, 2013 at 09:00 am
The traffic from the nearby Palisades Parkway is more of a noise nuisance than the cicada chorus.Read More (We have triple-paned windows because of it.) There is something almost musical about the hum of the cicadas. Of course, it may bother me more if I lived in the "affected area" and heard it constantly. Upon entering this nearby neighborhood, the sound crescendos. And yet, it can't be heard a couple of streets away. The drone of locusts is more bothersome than these 17 year cicadas.
Coleen Crowe June 10, 2013 at 01:30 pm
There are swarms of them at my house in upper nyack. Take a ride down Broadway in Upper Nyack nearRead More Nyack beach and they are super loud.
Linda June 8, 2013 at 10:39 am
I missed this! Is there still a way to get a signed copy? Maybe he will do another signing?
John Murphy June 11, 2013 at 08:20 am
This is the most accurate word picture of one of the tragic corollary side effects of one ofRead More humanities ' gruesome failings , which is war. Thank you Pam Sitomer for putting your writing genius to work for a noble cause.