.
Feedback

Zebrowski To Propose Amendment To New Gun Law

He wants to eliminate the possibility of a fee

 

Earlier this week, the New York State Assembly passed NY SAFE Act to strengthen the ban on assault weapons and high-capacity magazines, and on Friday Assemblyman Kenneth Zebrowski announced he’s going to propose an amendment to the law.

Zebrowski’s amendment will prohibit any surcharge or fee from being imposed for the new five-year pistol permit renewal and assault rifle registry. Under the law, pistol owners will have to renew their license every five years, and it will also create a registry for newly classified assault riffles. While the law didn’t call for a fee, there is no language prohibiting fees in the future either.


“I think it is important that we explicitly clarify the law so that no fees can ever be imposed for these programs in the future,” Zebrowski said. “I am happy the current administration has no plans to collect a fee, however, I think it is important that we assure gun owners that these programs are purely about public safety and can never be used as a tax.”

He added the possibility of a fee could hurt the program. 

“We want law abiding gun owners to cooperate with this new process and an arbitrary fee or surcharge threatens the success of the program by creating a disincentive,” Zebrowski said. “By clarifying the new law gun owners can be confident there will be no new costs with license renewal.”

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from New City Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Mary Tsotsoros January 19, 2013 at 11:59 am
The pistol permit renewal program and gun registry should be self-sustaining. General tax revenues should not be diverted to run this program. People who are hell-bent on owning weapons should pay a licensing fee.If you are that concerned that low income gun owners will not come forward, put a fee waiver process in place.
Tony T January 19, 2013 at 12:00 pm
Permit renewal is great idea.....just the fact that permits (and the were about of the weapons) will now be up dated on a regular basis is very important to gun control and keeping weapons out of the hands of criminals. The assumption is that permitted weapon holders are law abiding citizens and up-standing members of the community however the disposition of the weapons listed (if any) is just as important as who owns them. Last week the Journal News had an article on 3 hand guns stolen in New City....it also stated that the owners "Rockland and Orange County Pistol Permits were stolen". I thought that permits were only issued in the county of residence? Will renewal be required for all permit holder both existing and new? With the current system of "active" and "inactive" permits I expect that any renewal process for existing permit holders will show many of the "inactive" permits are for people who have passed away, moved to another state or county etc. Will there be any attempt to track the holder down or weapons listed on the permit by the serial #'s? The renewal process could open up a real can of worms I hope the Legislature has taken all the possibilities into consideration and are ready for what they may discover during this process?
peter cardiello January 19, 2013 at 09:47 pm
why not put a fee on gun permits. rockland county taxes us on our heat, our taxes our food our cloths and so on, so why not guns. to start up a business there are many fees to pay. i hope politicians put a fee on guns also.
obamasux January 19, 2013 at 11:43 pm
he should propose doing away with this stupid law as it only affects non criminals
Bernie January 20, 2013 at 03:31 am
ENOUGH, Fee this, Tax that. It is getting out of hand. We need the money to pay for criminal to sue the people they rob, criminal to have the best medical treatment, pay fot TV in jail. I am for a fee, but find the illegal guns and charge them. YES, your right this law is only for non criminals.
Sol Lachman January 20, 2013 at 02:47 pm
The use of the term "hell-bent" suggests you have your own agenda in addition to saving the government money.
Sol Lachman January 20, 2013 at 06:51 pm
The ridiculous part of this whole silly grandstand play on the part of legislators is revealed by the fact that President Obama who supposedly cares about gun control has never succeeded in appointing a Director to the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms, nor could he get a nominee confirmed by the Democrat-majority Senate. Finally, even though it is a felony punishable by up to 10 years in prison to lie on a Federal gun permit application, there were only 42 cases prosecuted last year! Talk about not enforcing existing law---this is outrageous! Even more outrageous is that VP Biden was quoted as saying that "the government doesn't have time to prosecute all the violators." But they DO have time to pass new laws that do nothing and in any case will also not be enforced.
Kathy January 20, 2013 at 11:24 pm
Why would anyone read the Journal News?
Helene Feigelman January 21, 2013 at 03:32 pm
There should be a fee for people who own guns. We have fees for car ownership, and animal ownership, so on and so forth. Why should gun owners not have a fee imposed upon them? They are not an elite group.
sam peterson January 23, 2013 at 04:42 pm
because lady gun ownership is a guaranteed right and not a privledge and should not be feed or taxed ...or restricted the new law is in violation of nys civil rights law the constitution of the us or even common sense ....other than trying to beat the obamanator to the punch andy blew it big time
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Jimmy R June 14, 2013 at 05:10 pm
The first thing little Frankie wanted to know was that since he was mayor of Suffern for the day,Read More could he get his bicycle fixed at the village Department of Public Works.
Paul Williams June 16, 2013 at 08:33 am
He also wanted to know the most effective method of spying on the other kids so he could get electedRead More Class President.
Green Farmer June 13, 2013 at 01:39 pm
Why not cut out the middle man and just send the money directly to the religious schools.
Paul Williams June 16, 2013 at 08:27 am
If they reported all their income........if every other home was not owned by a "RABBI"Read More and tax free.....if they returned all the books and learning materials they "borrowed" .......ETC ETC.....Get real Weeder.
Green Farmer June 13, 2013 at 01:42 pm
It will never happen.
M. Leybra June 16, 2013 at 07:25 pm
Shouldn't be happening in the first place & "requiring" another law to stop rippingRead More off Joe Blow taxpayer for county government elite, disgusting.
Champs pose for a picture (photo by Craig Fetterman)
Kevin Zawacki (Editor) June 12, 2013 at 11:03 am
Congratulations to the Cubs!
Scott F. June 12, 2013 at 11:35 am
The boys were awesome last night and all season long, a well deserved Championship for a great groupRead More of boys
Lisa Buchman (Editor) June 13, 2013 at 11:20 am
Fantastic! Just posted the photo on New City Facebook too!
Aerial of United Water's proposed water treatment plant
Tom Nimick June 11, 2013 at 09:23 pm
Mr. Pointing says that an issues conference is unusual. The unusual step is called for because thisRead More project is highly unusual; it is unprecedented. This French-owned water company wants to implement its pet technology at our expense - it makes sense for the company because the project makes lots of money. There is information available that calls into question the "definitive" studies carried out by the water company. Of course they found that their technology was the best option - what a surprise! They have not made the case that they carried out a disinterested examination of the issues in the public interest. Yes there are still issues. Also, stop threatening us with increased costs from delay. First, it does not make sense and second, you are trying to bully us into accepting your proposal. That is one more sign that something is wrong in your proposal.
John Taggart June 13, 2013 at 08:08 am
An issues conference will be a wast of time and money. So many ' issues ' have been pulled out ofRead More thin air. The people who organized against the plant will just keep saying the same thing. No amount of info will be enough, no answer will be accepted. The issues conference will be a circus of endless questions, ideas, and demands. Haverstraw bay reclassified as drinking water will better protect it, provide an endless supply of water and finally help end the stereotype of the Hudson being polluted Recommend
mike sullivan June 11, 2013 at 08:14 pm
get a life
Tom Nimick June 11, 2013 at 09:12 pm
There were no open meetings. I attended the April meeting and Mr. Lettre was directed by the TownRead More Board to return with more precise estimates and to include options for other upgrades. I have attended every meeting of the Town Board since that time and Mr. Lettre never returned in an open meeting. Mr. Borelli indicated that Mr. Lettre had addressed his concerns directly and privately. According to the Open Meetings Law, the deliberations of the Town Board are to be open and visible to the public. Private individual meetings or communications with members of the Town Board so as to avoid open deliberations flouts the intent of the Open Meetings Law. Mr. Gromack's statement of other meetings is inaccurate and, since it was specifically in response to a question about open meetings, dishonest. Mr. Borelli, shame on you for accepting a private communication and not standing by your guidance to Mr. Lettre that he was to come back to an open meeting of the Town Board.
Watchdog June 17, 2013 at 04:27 pm
Borelli and Ho -Man are in the bag for Lettre. They are not Republicans...just political hacks forRead More Lettre. RINOS.
galledeb June 10, 2013 at 10:45 am
How can I get more information? When and where are auditions?
Maddie June 10, 2013 at 04:25 pm
You can contact Pastor Robin at rdemaggio@ramapocentral.org
Tracy Urvater June 13, 2013 at 09:25 am
What are the dates of this camp?
Cicadas emerging from their 17 year slumber.
Kevin Zawacki (Editor) June 9, 2013 at 09:32 pm
Thanks for sharing, Grace! Your thoughts on their noise?
Grace Anthony Zemsky June 10, 2013 at 09:00 am
The traffic from the nearby Palisades Parkway is more of a noise nuisance than the cicada chorus.Read More (We have triple-paned windows because of it.) There is something almost musical about the hum of the cicadas. Of course, it may bother me more if I lived in the "affected area" and heard it constantly. Upon entering this nearby neighborhood, the sound crescendos. And yet, it can't be heard a couple of streets away. The drone of locusts is more bothersome than these 17 year cicadas.
Coleen Crowe June 10, 2013 at 01:30 pm
There are swarms of them at my house in upper nyack. Take a ride down Broadway in Upper Nyack nearRead More Nyack beach and they are super loud.
Linda June 8, 2013 at 10:39 am
I missed this! Is there still a way to get a signed copy? Maybe he will do another signing?
John Murphy June 11, 2013 at 08:20 am
This is the most accurate word picture of one of the tragic corollary side effects of one ofRead More humanities ' gruesome failings , which is war. Thank you Pam Sitomer for putting your writing genius to work for a noble cause.